Political Science 202 Syllabus for Fall 2007

Political Science 202 Syllabus for Fall 2007 - THE U.S....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
T HE U.S. S UPREME C OURT P OLITICAL S CIENCE 202 Fall 2007 Dr. McGuire 353 Hamilton Hall kmcguire@unc.edu 962-0431 The appointments of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito have focused new attention on the U.S. Supreme Court. As William Rehnquist’s successor, Roberts has already begun to guide the policy ambitions of the Court by limiting the reach of some of the Court’s prior rulings on issues as salient as abortion and affirmative action. For his part, Justice Alito is perceived as both a judicial and a political conservative and therefore likely to help strengthen the Court’s movement to the right. With the departure of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the moderate conservative upon whom the outcome of numerous salient issues hinged, Justice Anthony Kennedy now appears to be the critical member for determining the future of legal policy. Americans have developed a considerable interest in that legal policy. At least since the 1950s, they have perceived the Supreme Court as a governmental institution with significant influence over the political, social, and economic issues that affect their lives. As a consequence, various constituencies of the Court care a great deal about who gets to serve on the high court. This has not always been the case. The Founding Fathers contemplated a relatively limited role for the federal judiciary, devoting only minimal constitutional language to the judicial article: A Supreme Court and such other courts as Congress deemed prudent to provide, with the power to hear disputes arising under federal law. With no requirements regarding its size or qualifications for membership, the Court got off to a slow start. During its early years, for example, the Court was relegated to, among other places, the basement of the Capitol building, a room “little better than a dunjeon,” according to one observer. It was a modest player in Washington = s power game. Consequently, potential justices were, quite unlike today, reluctant to serve on the Court, opting instead for more prestigious political posts. Those who did accept faced literally life-threatening responsibilities, as they crisscrossed the countryside each year to help staff lower federal courts. At the Court itself, the cases were often trivial, decisionmaking was informal, and the policies the justices produced commanded little attention. Clearly, the members of the Court were not originally envisioned as occupying a central position in American political life, and yet today they do --- and in significant degrees. The modern Court has become transformed in a number of important respects. The justices now hear and decide cases in their own magnificent structure, the “Marble Palace,” adjacent to the Capitol. Service on the bench is highly coveted, and there is certainly no shortage of qualified individuals who are keen to fill vacancies when they occur. Similarly, the scope of its authority is quite extensive, selecting only a small number of cases from an annual docket of roughly
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/04/2008 for the course POLI 202 taught by Professor Mcguire during the Fall '07 term at UNC.

Page1 / 16

Political Science 202 Syllabus for Fall 2007 - THE U.S....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online