CCJS105 FINAL REVIEW

CCJS105 FINAL REVIEW - CCJS105 FINAL REVIEW CONTROL THEORY:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CCJS105 FINAL REVIEW CONTROL THEORY: Why does man commit crime? B/c he is prone to it Reiss (1951): Delinquency= failure of controls -Personal control- avoid conflict, delay gratification -Social control- surrounding institutions/community exerts control Toby: Stakes & Conformity: anyone can be criminal, dependant on one’s stakes in conformity Walter Reckless (1961): Containment Theory -people have a balance- push and pulls to commit crime Pushes: - bad family structure -inherently aggressive Pull: - peers -money -Containments: stop one from getting pushed or pulled -internal- religion, morals, conscience -external- parents, reputation SOCIAL BOND THEORY (Travis Hirschi): -4 bonds: -attachment- attached to family -involvement- conventional activities (clubs & groups), school -commitment- conventional lines of action -belief- belief in common values -If one doesn’t have these bonds, they commit crime -Criticism of theory: not all delinquents are devoid of these bonds Samson & Laub: -Delinquents as children, questioned as adults- why? -“Turning Points”- decline in crime (ex. Careers, family, military) Low Self-Control -Crime is opportunistic and impulsive -1 st degree murder- lengthy premeditation -Claims to be the only crime theory -People who are risk takers, show low self-restraint & physical- engage in many impulsive behaviors -Parenting & direct control- self-control determiner -Normal levels of self-control 1. Supervision 2. recognize deviant behavior
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
3.Punish deviant behavior -Can tell Self-control level at age 7/8, stay the same for rest of life -G & H did not believe in longitudinal behavior, s-c only factor (not gender, etc) -Specialized offenders- don’t exist, offenders are versatile, don’t consciously pick one area of crime Policy: -early childhood education -2 parent families/parenting classes -prevent teenage pregnancy NEO-CLASSICAL THEORIES: -free-will Cornish & Clarke: Rational Choice -Offenders are rational ppl who use cost/benefit analysis -2 stages of choice: 1. Criminal Decision- willing to commit crime? Any crime or certain types? (Abstract) 2. Criminal event decision- particular time/place, willing to commit particular crime? (Specific) -Choice structuring properties - how big is cost/benefit? -what are the odds of getting caught? -(ex. Area well lit, guarded?) -If it weighs in your favor, you commit, if it doesn’t you don’t -Bounded rationality- had incorrect/incomplete info ENVIRONMENTAL: -Offenders take in situational context and exact situations -Geographic profiling- Kim Rosmo- quantifiable info used to determine where criminal lives and where another crime is likely to occur -Hotspots- (crime mapping)- small number of places generate most crime, important for
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/08/2011 for the course CCJS 105 taught by Professor Mcgoin during the Spring '08 term at Maryland.

Page1 / 7

CCJS105 FINAL REVIEW - CCJS105 FINAL REVIEW CONTROL THEORY:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online