100%(1)1 out of 1 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 1 - 4 out of 11 pages.
Running head: ANALYSES OF BLOCKBUSTER 1Analyses of blockbusterStudent’s nameInstitution of affiliationDate
ANALYSES OF BLOCKBUSTER 2Abstract Blockbuster Inc. was ones the world's leading video rental company of in-home, storeand online viewing options. The corporation runs about 9,100 video stores in the USA, itsdependencies and 24 other nations, offering service to over three million consumers every day.Founded in the mid-1980s, the organization became a world chain of films, DVDs, video gamesand an electronic abonnity platform as an option to independent, local companies with a widerange of video renting. In 1999 Viacom sold a controlling stake in the venture and sold theremainder in 2004. Owing to its "no late payments" policy in 2005, loss of revenue due toextended viewing rates, a futile attempt to merge with rival Hollywood Film Corporation andbusiness raider Carl, the company seem to have fled in 2005. To retain new clients and hold themupdated the business depends highly on its ads and promotions. To reclaim strategic advantagesfrom their rivals, the adoption of their revised marketing plan by Blockbuster was not enough.Not only has Blockbuster struggled to award its external climate, but it has also failed to adjust toa revolutionary corporate paradigm and modernize its market approach and retain its competitiveedge. This paper analyses the historical evolution of the company and the cause of the failures ofthe company.
ANALYSES OF BLOCKBUSTER 3Company historyAntioco and the management team declined a $50 million bid from Reed to purchaseNetflix. That year, Blockbuster entered into a 20-year contract with the Internet service knownsEron. Nevertheless the deal was terminated within a year after Eron was declared bankrupt.Netflix continued to capture blockbuster market share over the next several years. Netflixlaunched and shipped DVD's via e-mail, a payment platform. For a month, Netflix priced itsservices at $16.99 and enabled the consumer to pick 3 movies without thinking about the late fee(Downes & Nunes, 2013). When they returned an old video, Netflix provided the customer withnew films. Netflix continued to capture lucrative subscribers with late payments scrapped andhome delivery. Blockbuster has since started adding a monthly rental charge, but the late fee hasnot ceased because it was an essential aspect of their profits. Blockbuster also launched its ownmail service in 2004, but Netflix already had over 3 million subscribers at the point. To boost theBlockbuster's earnings, late payments were also eliminated, but damages were not retrieved asthe company had already lost its clients. Blockbuster held up with its convenience outlets, butcustomers had sorted new alternatives from Netflix and Redbox. With shifting times,Blockbuster's plan to alter its operating model only contributes to bankruptcy.