espm104-HollingII - checked the nullclines for y. If y...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Lecture followup October 14, 2010 A follow-up on something from lecture today: In the Holling Type II example, with a functional response φ ( x ) for predator-prey encounters, I was surprised to see what looked like a mass action encounter term in the equation for predator change. That is, why do we have dy dt = - cy + dxy (1) instead of dy dt = - cy + d ( bx k + x ) (2) I wondered how much difference it would make in the phase plane, so I
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: checked the nullclines for y. If y > 0, then dy dt = 0 N = ma b-m (3) So the phase plane hasnt changed much the second nullcline for y is still a vertical line. Not only that, but in eq. (1) we got to choose our parameter d = bk . If k = c ( b-m ) bma (4) then the second y nullcline is still x = c/d , which is a lot easier to write. 1...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/09/2011 for the course EEP 115 taught by Professor Waynem.getz during the Fall '10 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online