solutions - Solutions to Assignment Section 2.1 #4 Solution...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Solutions to Assignment Section 2.1 #4 Solution 1 Consider the real number a & ( a + ( 1)) : We have a & ( a + ( 1)) = ( a & a ) + ( a & ( 1)) ; by distributive law = a + ( a ) ; by our assumption a & a = a = Hence by Theorem 2.1.3 (b), we have a = 0 or a + ( 1) = 0 : In other words, a = 0 or a = 1 : #4 Solution 2 Suppose a 6 = 0 : Then 9 1 a 2 R such that a & 1 a = 1 : Hence 1 = a & 1 a = ( a & a ) & 1 a = a & ( a & 1 a ) = a & 1 = a: In other words, a = 1 : (Technically we don&t need to verify that and 1 are solutions to the equation a & a = a , although this is very easy to do.) #8 (a) We can write x and y in terms of fractions x = a b ; and y = c d ; such that a;b; c; d 2 Z ; and bd 6 = 0 : then using the properties of real numbers and the fact that Z is closed under + and & ; we see that x + y = ad + bc bd 2 Q xy = ac bd 2 Q as well. Hence Q is closed under + and & : #8 (b) Suppose y is irrational. Note by the same argument as above, Q is closed under taking additive inverse, and Q nf g is closed under taking multiplicative inverse. So if x 2 Q and ( x + y ) 2 Q ; then ( x ) 2 Q and y = ( x + y ) + ( x ) 2 Q ; which is a contradiction. If x 6 = 0 ; x 2 Q and xy 2 Q ; then 1 x 2 Q ; and y = ( xy ) & ( 1 x ) 2 Q ; which is a contradiction. #20 (a) By Theorem 2.1.7 (c), the condition < c < 1 ; if the inequalities are multiplied by c; means < c 2 < c: Hence < c 2 < c < 1 by Theorem 2.1.7 (a). #20 (b) Again, 1 < c leads to c < c 2 ; and hence 1 < c < c 2 : Section 2.2 #4 Here it is implicit that " > ; otherwise two statements are trivially true and hence they imply each other. By Theorem 2.2.2 (c), j x a j < " if and only if " < x a < ": By Theorem 2.1.7 (b), this is equivalent to a " < x < a + "; by adding a or adding ( a ) to go back and forth between the two statements....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/09/2011 for the course MATH 415 taught by Professor Bertrandguillou during the Spring '08 term at University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.

Page1 / 4

solutions - Solutions to Assignment Section 2.1 #4 Solution...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online