When Choice is Demotivating Can One Desire Too Much

When Choice is Demotivating Can One Desire Too Much -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? Sheena S. Iyengar Columbia University Mark R. Lepper Stanford University Current psychological theory and research affirm the positive affective and motivational consequences of having personal choice. These findings have led to the popular notion that the more choice, the better—that the human ability to manage, and the human desire for, choice is unlimited. Findings from 3 experimental studies starkly challenge this implicit assumption that having more choices is necessarily more intrinsically motivating than having fewer. These experiments, which were conducted in both field and laboratory settings, show that people are more likely to purchase gourmet jams or chocolates or to undertake optional class essay assignments when offered a limited array of 6 choices rather than a more extensive array of 24 or 30 choices. Moreover, participants actually reported greater subsequent satisfaction with their selections and wrote better essays when their original set of options had been limited. Implications for future research are discussed. Ne quid nimis. (In all things moderation.) —Publius Terentius Afer (Terence), c. 171 B.C. It is a common supposition in modern society that the more choices, the better—that the human ability to manage, and the human desire for, choice is infinite. From classic economic theo- ries of free enterprise, to mundane marketing practices that provide customers with entire aisles devoted to potato chips or soft drinks, to important life decisions in which people contemplate alternative career options or multiple investment opportunities, this belief pervades our institutions, norms, and customs. Ice cream parlors compete to offer the most flavors; major fast-food chains urge us to "Have it our way." Sheena S. Iyengar, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University; Mark R. Lepper, Department of Psychology, Stanford University. We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation and assistance of Draeger's Grocery Store located in Menlo Park, California, for generously offering their store as a field site for conducting Study 1. Similarly, Study 2 could not have occurred without the cooperation and support of Claude Steele at Stanford University who generously allowed his introductory social psy- chology course to be used as a forum for conducting this field experiment. Further, we would like to thank the numerous graduate students in the Department of Psychology at Stanford University and undergraduate re- search assistants who generously dedicated their time and effort to help conduct these studies. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sheena S. Iyengar, Columbia University, Graduate School of Business, Uris Hall- Room 714, 3022 Broadway, New York, New York 10027-6902, or to Mark R. Lepper, Department of Psychology, Jordan Hall-Building 420, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2130. Electronic mail may be sent
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/14/2011 for the course ORGANIC CH 341 taught by Professor Idk during the Spring '11 term at University of Wisconsin.

Page1 / 12

When Choice is Demotivating Can One Desire Too Much -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online