ANOVA two way ppt

# ANOVA two way ppt - Two-Way Analysis of Variance Section...

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Two-Way Analysis of Variance Section 11.2 Two-Way ANOVA 1 Two-Way ANOVA Earlier we classified the data one way (by dimple design or by hospital). In some problems, there may be several experimental factors and the data can be classified several ways. The ANOVA procedure can be extended to this. Two-Way ANOVA 2 The parachute factory Four suppliers manufacture the synthetic thread we use to weave parachutes in our factory. We use two types of looms, the Jetta and the Turk. We want to know if the fabric strength depends on supplier, on loom, or if it is combinations of supplier and loom. Two-Way ANOVA 3 Brake job promotion A chain of auto stores puts their standard brake job on sale. In some places, they promote a lower labor price. In some, a lower parts price. Some others just promote the lower total price. Which works best? Is it the same across the country, or does it depend on region? Two-Way ANOVA 4 The Two-Way Design We allow for potential differences due to different levels of factor A. We also allow for potential differences due to different levels of factor B. We also recognize that these differences may not be consistent so combinations of factor A and B may be what matters. Two-Way ANOVA 5 Notation Let's say there are c levels of factor B. r levels of factor A and We thus have a total of rc combinations of the two factors. We will only look at problems where there are more than one observation for each combination, call it n' replicates per cell. Two-Way ANOVA 6 Data organization Data are organized in a rectangle. 1. There will be c columns, one for each level of factor B. 2. Each of the r levels of factor A will have a "sample" of n' rows. 3. There are thus r n' total rows of data. Two-Way ANOVA 7 Parachute2.xls Loom Type Jetta Jetta Jetta Jetta Jetta Turk Turk Turk Turk Turk Supplier 1 Supplier 2 Supplier 3 Supplier 4 20.6 22.6 27.7 21.5 18.0 24.6 18.6 20.0 19.0 19.6 20.8 21.1 21.3 23.8 25.1 23.9 13.2 27.1 17.7 16.0 18.5 26.3 20.6 25.4 24.0 25.3 25.2 19.9 17.2 24.0 20.8 22.6 19.9 21.2 24.7 17.5 18.0 24.5 22.9 20.4 c = 4, r = 2 and n' = 5 Two-Way ANOVA 8 Means plot A good exploratory tool is to plot the average value of x that occurs at each combination of factors. The average x goes on the vertical axis and one of the factors on the horizontal axis. Use lines to connect the means for the other factor. If the lines are roughly parallel, it is a signal that there is no interaction. Two-Way ANOVA 9 Table of means Part of the Two-Way output: SUMMARY Jetta Supplier 1 5 92.1 18.42 10.202 Supplier 2 5 117.7 23.54 7.568 Supplier 3 5 109.9 21.98 18.397 Supplier 4 Total Count Sum Average Variance Turk 5 20 102.5 422.2 20.5 21.11 8.355 13.12832 Count Sum Average Variance 5 97.6 19.52 7.237 5 121.3 24.26 3.683 5 114.2 22.84 4.553 5 20 105.8 438.9 21.16 21.945 8.903 8.462605 Two-Way ANOVA 10 Plot of means C e l l M e a ns P l ot 25 23 21 j etta t ur k 19 17 15 Sup p l i e r 1 Su p p l i e r 2 Su p p l i e r 3 Su pp l i e r 4 Two-Way ANOVA 11 Quick Impressions The Turk looms produce slightly stronger fabric, but not by much. There are supplier differences, with # 2 looking like the winner. The supplier differences do not depend on loom type. Two-Way ANOVA 12 Sources of variation We have 2x4 = 8 samples of size 5. The between-sample variation is more complicated since it can be due to different suppliers, different looms, or different combinations of the supplier and loom (interaction). There are three tests, one for each of these sources. Two-Way ANOVA 13 Interaction Interaction means the value of one factor changes the "pecking order" of the other factor. For example, if supplier 1 was better for Turk looms but worst for Jetta looms. When there is interaction, the mean lines will not be parallel. Two-Way ANOVA 14 Interaction vs. No Interaction No interaction: Block Level 1 Mean Response Block Level 1 Block Level 2 Block Level 3 Block Level 3 Block Level 2 Interaction is present: Mean Response A B Groups C A Two-Way ANOVA B Groups C 15 ANOVA Output ANOVA Source of Variation Sample Columns Interaction Within Total SS 6.97225 134.34875 0.28675 275.592 417.19975 df 1 3 3 32 39 MS F P-value F crit 6.97225 0.8095736 0.3749678 4.1490974 44.782917 5.199909 0.0048662 2.9011196 0.0955833 0.0110985 0.9983646 2.9011196 8.61225 Gory details on pages 397-399. 2. "Sample" refers to the factor arrayed across the rows (loom type). 1. Two-Way ANOVA 16 Test Results 1. 1. No interaction effect (F = 0.011). There is no loom effect (on the row labeled "Sample" the F = 0.809) There are significant differences due to suppliers (on the row labeled "Columns" the F = 5.199) Two-Way ANOVA 17 1. Tukey comparisons If there is at most "mild" interaction, you can look for significant differences in factor levels with a Tukey procedure. then declares anything above that significant. It again figures out the "critical range" and We can apply it here to determine which suppliers are significantly better or worse. Two-Way ANOVA 18 Critical range for column differences We have c column levels and each one has a total of r n' observations. Compute: CR = Q MSE r n Get Q from the studentized range table with c and rc(n'-1) degrees of freedom. MSE is from the ANOVA table (within groups). Two-Way ANOVA 19 Table of means again SUMMARY jetta 1 5 92.1 18.42 10.202 turk 2 5 117.7 23.54 7.568 3 5 109.9 21.98 18.397 4 Total 5 20 102.5 422.2 20.5 21.11 8.355 13.12832 Count Sum Average Variance Count Sum Average Variance Total 5 97.6 19.52 7.237 5 121.3 24.26 3.683 5 114.2 22.84 4.553 5 20 105.8 438.9 21.16 21.945 8.903 8.462605 Count Sum Average Variance 10 189.7 18.97 8.0868 10 239 23.9 5.1444 10 224.1 22.41 10.4054 10 208.3 20.83 7.7912 r n' xbars 20 Two-Way ANOVA What difference is significant? CR = Q c = ____ MSE r n =? r n' = ____ Q has c and rc(n'-1) df = ____ MSE = ____ Two-Way ANOVA 21 Brake job promotion The price of a brake job was reduced by \$50. This was advertised with either a discount on labor, parts or the total price. Which worked best? Did it depend on what region of the country we looked at? There was a sample of 10 stores in each combination of region and promotion strategy BrakeJobPromotion.xls Two-Way ANOVA 22 Means Plot 700 600 500 Sales Increase 400 LaborPriceAvg PartsPriceAvg TotalPriceAvg 300 200 100 0 MidWest NorthEast Region South West What impressions do we get from this? Two-Way ANOVA 23 ANOVA and test results ANOVA Source of Variation Sample Columns Interaction Within Total SS 874348 257226.8 499559.8 3505265 5136400 df 2 3 6 108 119 MS 437174.01 85742.28 83259.97 32456.16 F 13.4697 2.6418 2.5653 P-value 0.0000 0.0530 0.0232 F crit 3.0804 2.6887 2.1837 Interaction test Column (Region) effect test 3. Row (Promotion Type) effect test 1. 2. Two-Way ANOVA 24 Is there an optimal policy? Do sales increases depend on region? For promotion type, what is the Tukey critical range? Is there an optimal type of promotion? Two-Way ANOVA 25 Table of means SUMMARY LaborPrice MidWest NorthEast South 10 6656.00 665.60 42187.16 West 10 4519.00 451.90 18549.88 Total 40 19560.00 489.00 46558.82 Count Sum LaborPriceAvg Variance PartsPrice 10 10 2963.00 5422.00 296.30 542.20 8554.46 51877.29 Count Sum PartsPriceAvg Variance TotalPrice 10 10 3468.00 3563.00 346.80 356.30 19143.96 27914.23 10 3623.00 362.30 36192.68 10 3362.00 336.20 29533.51 40 14016.00 350.40 26127.43 Count Sum TotalPriceAvg Variance Total 10 10 2911.00 2400.00 291.10 240.00 14332.54 28941.33 10 2966.00 296.60 61071.16 10 3088.00 308.80 51175.73 40 11365.00 284.13 36597.14 Count Sum Average Variance 30 30 30 30 9342 11385 13245 10969 311.4 379.5 441.5 365.633333 13696.94 49768.74 69998.397 34783.2747 Two-Way ANOVA 26 Severe Interaction Here we had "mild" interaction, but could still see the main factor effects. When there is strong interaction, it sometimes is hard to see factor effects. Here is a different version of this problem where things are not so clear. Two-Way ANOVA 27 Means plot with strong interaction 700 600 500 Sales Increase 400 300 200 100 0 MidWest NorthEast Region South West LaborPriceAvg PartsPriceAvg TotalPriceAvg Two-Way ANOVA 28 ANOVA and test results ANOVA Source of Variation Sample Columns Interaction Within Total SS 353303 631958.5 2447098 3505265 6937625 df 2 3 6 108 119 MS 176651.51 210652.83 407849.70 32456.16 F 5.4428 6.4904 12.5662 P-value 0.0056 0.0004 0.0000 F crit 3.0804 2.6887 2.1837 Interaction test Column (Region) effect test 3. Row (Promotion Type) effect test 1. 2. Two-Way ANOVA 29 Table of means SUMMARY LaborPrice MidWest 10 3663.00 366.30 8554.46 NorthEast South 10 3922.00 392.20 51877.29 10 6656.00 665.60 42187.16 West 10 2019.00 201.90 18549.88 Total 40 16260.00 406.50 56376.00 Count Sum LaborPriceAvg Variance PartsPrice Count Sum PartsPriceAvg Variance TotalPrice 10 6468.00 646.80 19143.96 10 1063.00 106.30 27914.23 10 1123.00 112.30 36192.68 10 3362.00 336.20 29533.51 40 12016.00 300.40 75855.63 Count Sum TotalPriceAvg Variance Total 10 2911.00 291.10 14332.54 10 2400.00 240.00 28941.33 10 2966.00 296.60 61071.16 10 3088.00 308.80 51175.73 40 11365.00 284.13 36597.14 Count Sum Average Variance 30 13042 434.73 37280.62 30 7385 246.17 47857.25 30 10745 358.17 98021.39 30 8469 282.30 34277.53 Two-Way ANOVA 30 Now is there an optimal policy? First, can we do Tukey comparisons? Do sales increases depend on region? Is there an optimal type of promotion? Two-Way ANOVA 31 ...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern