Raymond_Peer_Review_Worksheet

Raymond_Peer_Review_Worksheet - Review By: Jonathan...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Review By: Jonathan Sullivan Peer Response Checklist Directions: Use the checklist below for your peer reviews. Please copy and paste the paper you are reviewing below the checklist. Keep in mind that this assignment is graded and that your grade will be determined by how detailed your review is. A best practice is to provide a detailed explanation for each answer--approximately a paragraph. Not required, but strongly suggested: Use Track Changes to add your comments and suggestions to the appropriate areas in the paper. 1. Writer's Name Raymond Dunphy 2. What is the type and purpose of this paper? Type is Comparison and Contrast and the purpose is to compare Batman to Superman. 2. What is the thesis of this paper? Does it reflect the topic and purpose of the paper? Batman and Superman both have differences on how they use their secret identities, reason why they fight crime, and how they use their abilities. 3. What is the biggest problem area of the paper? (Organization, development of ideas, grammar, punctuation, etc.) Explain your answer. The introduction paragraph needs a little more fluff, as it only contains three sentences. 4. What is the biggest strength of the paper? Explain your answer. Overall, the paper is well written and has plenty of great descriptive details throughout. 5. What material doesn't seem to fit the main point or the audience? Are all of the topic sentences points of the thesis? Are all of the support sentences facts, examples, reasons, etc. to explain the topic sentence? If not, which need revision? The facts and examples in the paper are perfect. But, you need to watch out for past and present tense as well as use of the word “well” it should be “while”
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Review By: Jonathan Sullivan 6. At what point does the paper fail to hold the reader's interest? Where should more details or examples be added? Why? If the paper has good detail, point out these areas, too. The paper already contains plenty of great descriptive details. 7.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/15/2011 for the course NCM 545 taught by Professor Matter during the Spring '11 term at DeVry Oak Brook.

Page1 / 14

Raymond_Peer_Review_Worksheet - Review By: Jonathan...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online