11 - Ineffability (metaphysical claim) o Vs. Unknowable...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Rowe’s Q: Is there a reality designated by Hick’s expression “the Real”? Rowe’s Chief Difficulty: He cannot see how “the Real” can avoid having one or the other of two contradictory properties. o Personal and Non-personal Hick’s “real” is neither ^ Epistemological = what we know o Vs. Metaphysical – character of reality itself A. Skeptical Position a. Can also include the idea that we just don’t know B. Dogmatic/Particularistic o Inclusivist o Exclusivist Hick’s says that Rowe’s concern is “misleading” o ^ Hick’s response to “Rowe’s Chief Difficulty”
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Ineffability (metaphysical claim) o Vs. Unknowable (epistemological claim) Tolstoys Confession: Four Interrelated Themes 1. The reality of suffering 2. The inevitability of death 3. The meaning of life 4. The existence of God Questions when reading Tolstoys Confession: 1. How does the reality of death/suffering lead to a problem about lifes meaning? 2. What is the connection for Tolstoy between Gods existence/character and meaning? 3. What kind of meaning is he longing for? a. Is he looking for merely an intellectual explanation or answer?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/17/2011 for the course PHIL 101 taught by Professor Bergeron during the Fall '10 term at Loyola Chicago.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online