Morrison Memo - Morrison-Asbestos Case To: Damara Watkins...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Morrison-Asbestos Case To: Damara Watkins From: Brandon Simpson Date: 2/18/2011 Re: Assignment 5 Professor, The following is the information I have compiled regarding the evidence on the Morrison case dealing with which rules allow and by what means it is authenticated. The pieces of evidence I have looked up include: A. Photographs from the work place B. A letter from Peter Wayans apologizing for his companys involvement C. A letter from Acme Inc’s insurance company saying they will “take care” of the case D. A recorded statement from Joseph Polizo E. A Deposition from Joseph Polizo F. Copies of Morrison’s medical bills G. Copies of Morrison’s medical records H. A report from the EPA detailing the dangers of asbestos. a) According to rule 401, the definition of “relevant evidence” is something that makes, “ha[s] any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

Morrison Memo - Morrison-Asbestos Case To: Damara Watkins...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online