This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Practice Final Exam December 14, 2009 1 New Material 1.1 ANOVA 1. A puri cation process for a chemical involves passing it, in solution, through a resin on which impurities are adsorbed. A chemical engineer is testing the e ciency of 3 di erent resins in collecting impurities; he breaks each resin into 5 pieces and measures the concentration of impurities after passing through the resins. The data are as follows: Concentration of impurities Resin 1 Resin 2 Resin 3 .046 .038 .031 .025 .035 .042 .014 .031 .020 .017 .022 .018 .043 .012 .039 Test the hypothesis that there is no di erence in the e ciency of the resins, using analysis of variance tech niques. Solution We want to test the hypothesis H : 1 = 2 = 3 . The analysis of variance table is Source d.f. SOS Mean Squares Fstatistic Treatments 2 SSTr = 1 . 4533 10 5 MSTr = 7 . 27 10 6 F = 0 . 0487 Error 12 SSE = 0 . 0018 MSE = 1 . 49 10 4 Total 14 SST = 0 . 0018 pvalue: . 953 Since our pvalue is . 953 , we can accept the null hypothesis. 2. Four standard chemical procedures are used to determine the magnesium content in a certain chemical com pound. Each procedure is used four times on a given compound with the following data resulting: Magnesium content Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 76.42 80.41 74.20 86.20 78.62 82.26 72.68 86.04 80.40 81.15 78.84 84.36 78.20 79.20 80.32 80.68 Do the data indicate that the procedures yield equivalent results? Solution We want to test the hypothesis H : 1 = 2 = 3 = 4 . The analysis of variance table is Source d.f. SOS Mean Squares Fstatistic Treatments 3 SSTr = 135 . 7625 MSTr = 45 . 254 F = 7 . 474 Error 12 SSE = 72 . 66 MSE = 6 . 055 Total 15 208.4230 pvalue: . 0044 Since our pvalue is . 0044 , we can safely reject the null hypothesis. 1 3. For data x ij , i = 1 ,...,m , j = 1 ,...,m , show that x = m X i =1 x i /m = n X j =1 x j /n where x = 1 mn m i =1 n j =1 x ij is the sample mean of all x ij . Solution We can write x = 1 mn m X i =1 n X j =1 x ij = 1 m m X i =1 1 n n X j =1 x ij  {z } = x i = m X i =1 x i /m Also, x = 1 mn m X i =1 n X j =1 x ij = 1 mn n X j =1 m X i =1 x ij = 1 n n X j =1 1 m m X i =1 x ij !  {z } = x j = n X j =1 x j /n 4. Problem 11.1.21 in the text. Solution The rst con dence interval, for example, is 1 2 x 1  x 2 sq ,k, 2 r 1 n 1 + 1 n 2 = 46 . 09 42 . 21 4 . 33 q . 05 , 5 , 40 2 r 1 10 + 1 9 ! = ( 1 . 803 , 9 . 563) This establishes that the hypothesis 1 = 2 is plausible at the . 05 signi cance level, since the interval contains . Carrying out this procedure for all pairs, the con dence intervals that contain are 1 2 , 2 5 , and 3 4 . The largest mean is 3 or 4 and the smallest mean is either 2 or 5 , which can be veri ed by looking at the values of x 1 through x 5 1.2 Regression 1. The following table shows the number of units of a good that customers ordered, when the good was priced1....
View
Full
Document
 Spring '08
 Staff

Click to edit the document details