25 R - common) III. Neoliberal Critique: argues narrow...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
POLS 206-508 R 10/25 Interest Groups II I. Pluralism II. Populist Critique III. Neoliberal Critique Interest Groups II I. Pluralism: an enthusiastic endorsement of interest groups Alexis de Tocqueville: calls interest groups voluntary associations; argues that they are a crucial part of a democracy because they ensure you will not end up with a tyrannical government (check on political process) II. Populist Critique Makes a distinction between high-profile lobbyists and ordinary citizens William Greider: claimed interest groups tend to have upper-middle class involved and represent the will of the American people; his solution is to subsidize interest groups for poor and working class (iron triangle…very
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: common) III. Neoliberal Critique: argues narrow interests take precedent Critiques share some of the same concerns about the power of interest groups Instead of focusing on the problems, politicians tend to work on repairing narrow interests and losing the bigger picture about the entire budget Politicians don’t want to put their necks on the line Jonathan Rauch: interest groups have increased in such an extent that we now have hyperpluralism—no matter the interest, there is a group for you; says we stream-line government Madisonianism gone crazy...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/04/2008 for the course POLS 206 taught by Professor Someonethatwasjusttryingtogettheirdoctorate during the Fall '06 term at Texas A&M.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online