This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: know that was acquired illegally she would be committing a wrongfull action that interfere with individuals legally recognized rights with regard to their personal property (goods). 4-Besides the fact that if an action constitutes a breach of the duty of care is determined on case-by-case basis, Darla did no breach her duty of care. The law says that the courts ask how a reasonable person would have acted in the same circunstances, and since Darla works and knows the store, she is a resonable person, and she would not have opened the door, and thus, would not have suffered the accident....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/25/2011 for the course BUS 331 taught by Professor Jeane during the Spring '11 term at Mt. Olive.
- Spring '11