CHAPTER 9 - CHAPTER 9 Strategy Review, Evaluation and...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHAPTER 9 Strategy Review, Evaluation and Control True/False The Nature of Strategy Evaluation 1. If strategy implementation is successful, an enterprise can be lulled into complacency with success. Ans: F Page: 300 2. Adequate, timely feedback is important to effective strategy evaluation. Ans: T Page: 300 3. Too much emphasis on evaluating strategies may be expensive and counterproductive. Ans: T Page: 300 4. Strategy evaluation should have a long-run focus and avoid a short-run focus, given that strategies are long term in nature. Ans: F Page: 300 5. According to Richard Rumelt, consonance and consistency are based on a firm’s external assessment. Ans: F Page: 300 6. According to Rumelt, consistency and feasibility are largely based on a firm’s internal assessment. Ans: T Page: 300 7. Regardless of the size of the organization, a certain amount of management by wandering around at all levels is essential to effective strategy evaluation. Ans: T Page: 300 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
8. Falsification of reports can result from too great an insistence on attainment of objectives. Ans: T Page: 300 9. Consistency, distinctiveness, advantage and feasibility are Richard Rumelt’s four criteria for evaluating a strategy. Ans: F Page: 300 10. Most top managers feel an organization’s well-being depends on evaluation of the strategic-management process. Ans: T Page: 300 11. Strategy evaluation is becoming increasingly easier with the passage of time, given the technological advances. Ans: F Page: 301 12. The decreasing time span for which planning can be done with any degree of certainty is a reason strategy evaluation is more difficult today. Ans: T Page: 301 13. Consistency refers to the need for strategists to examine sets of trends as well as individual trends in evaluating strategies. Ans: F Page: 302 14. The need for strategists to examine sets of trends as well as individual trends in evaluating strategies is referred to as consonance. Ans: T Page: 302 15. The final broad test of strategy is consistency, that is, can the strategy be implemented consistently every year. Ans: F Page: 302 16. Strategies may be inconsistent if policy problems and issues continue to be brought to the top for resolution. Ans: T Page: 302 2
Background image of page 2
17. Competitive advantages normally are the result of superiority in one of three areas: feasibility, consistency, or consonance. Ans: F Page: 302 18. Because large companies have more at stake, it is more important for large organizations to conduct strategy evaluation than small companies. Ans: F Page: 303 19. When empowered employees are held accountable for and pressured to achieve specific goals and are given wide latitude in their actions to achieve them, there can be dysfunctional behavior. Ans: T
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 20

CHAPTER 9 - CHAPTER 9 Strategy Review, Evaluation and...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online