CEE_597_Final_1995 - CEE 597 - Risk Analysis and Management...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CEE 597 - Risk Analysis and Management Final Exam May 17,1995 An apology: I hope you learned more than a simple test like this can reveal. Test is open book and open notes. <And too long.> You have 150 minutes to complete this 150 point exam. Balance your effort with the points. Show important steps. 1. (12 points) Terrorist attacks in this country make big news (bombings, airplane sabotage, poison in water supplies, cyanide in Tylenol capsules, and that sort of stuff). Assume that attacks within the country killing 2 5 people an expected to occur on average once ever 4 years, following a Poisson Process. a) If I started collecting information on attacks now, what is the mean and variance of the time I would have to wait to gather information on 10 attacks? b) What is the probability of more than 2 attacks in the next 10 years? What is the probability of an attack in the next month? C) Why might a Poisson process be a good model of terrorist attacks? What weaknesses would a Poisson model have ? 2. (20 points) Consider the system described by the network: a) What are the minimal cut sets ? b) What are the minimal paths if B is not functioning ? c) If all elements are 99.9% reliable, what approximately is probability this system will fail ? d) Draw the best fault tree you can to describe this network. Is it a proper fault tree? If not, what is the problem?
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
3. (6 points) Consider a system with two independent components in series. Assume arrival rates for failures of both components are Poisson processes with arrival rates of h and 2h, and both components work initially. What value must h have for the system to be 99.9% reliable after 1,000 hours of operation. 4. (7 points) It was recently suggested that because airplanes travel faster than cars, accidents per mile is an inappropriate criterion for safety comparisons. Instead, they suggest "deaths per hour of travel." Do you agree or disagree with this suggestion. WHY ? (Be careful to clarify the purpose of the analysis.) What aspect of the risk does "deaths per hour of travel" stress? 5. (15 points) A risk analysts is concerned with the likelihood of and possible magnitude of toxic gas releases from a manufacturing facility. <Here we go!> Things can go wrong in either process #1, process #2, during loading, or from leaks from either 1 tank, or from 2 tanks. The frequency of each kind of accident and the amount of toxic gas that might be released are listed below: Accident Type Fre quencv Potential toxic gas release process #I 0.05 /yr 5,000 m3 process #2 0.04 10,000 m3 during loading 0.03 leaks from 1 tank 0.02 leaks from 2 tanks 0.01 /yr The potential release will occur unless action is taken. Either the potential toxic gas release can be stored if empty tanks are available, or it can be neutralized in a scrubber, or most of it can be partially destroyed by emitting it through a flame tower. Because Flame tower only destroys 90% of gas, it is used only as a last resort!
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 9

CEE_597_Final_1995 - CEE 597 - Risk Analysis and Management...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online