CEE_597_Final_1996

# CEE_597_Final_1996 - CEE 597 Risk Analysis and Management...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

CEE 597 - Risk Analysis and Management Final Exam May 10,1996 An apology: I hope you learned more than a simple test like this can reveal. * Test is open book and open notes. You have 150 minutes to complete this 150 point exam. Show important steps. 1. (5 points) Of all the case studies (except TMI) we discussed and in the reading (Bhopal, Titianic, DC-10, and those in short studies), which was your favorite, and what important lesson did it teach about the character of system failures? 2. (10 points) Different criteria can be used to describe different risks. Consider a comparison of rollerblading and bicycle riding. Injury rates could be expressed as (i) I injuries per mile, (ii) injuries per hour of activity, or (iii) injuries per participant per year. What is the key strength of each of these three criteria, and a reasonable risk- management question that each criteria directly addresses? 3. (20 points) Consider the complex system described by the network: a) What are all the minimal cut sets with 1, 2, 3 or 4 components? b) What are the minimal paths? c) If all elements are 99% reliable, what approximately is the probability system fails? d) Draw the best fault tree you can describing this network if E is not functioning ? Is it a proper fault tree? If not, what is the problem? e) If you could upgrade one component in original network (with E) to 99.99% reliability, which would you choose to maximize reliability of the system ?

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
4. (15 points) Major train derailments continue to happen. Consider derailments of at least 10 cars. Assume that 15 such derailment happened in the last 5 years, and assume that this rate will continue. a) What is the probability of 2 or more derailments in one year? b) What is the mean and variance of the time one would expect to wait to observe 25 derailments? C) If 15 derailments were observed in 5 years, then one can estimate the annual derailment rate as you have above. What is the standard deviation of that estimate? d) Why is a Poisson process a good model of such derailments? 5. (12 points) This problem could take TOO long if you do not economize. This weekend Prof. Stedinger is going backpacking with the Boy Scouts. Suppose that they take 2 white-gas stoves and using good fuel, each stove has a probability of 1 in 50 of failing (independent failures). There is an 80% chance that a failed stove can be repaired. However if Ken Mudge, who is bringing the white gas, brings bad fuel for the stoves [prob. of good fuel is 90%, prob. of poor fuel is lo%], the probability each stove fails increases to 1 in 4 (independent failures), but there is still a 80% chance each failed stove can be repaired. (The success of repair efforts are independent.) Draw the event tree carefully. Calculate
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 7

CEE_597_Final_1996 - CEE 597 Risk Analysis and Management...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online