ps3_101_2011_solution

Ps3_101_2011_solutio - Economics 101 Solutions to Problem Set 3 Due Thursday February 3 2011 Soojin Kim 1 Nicholson and Snyder problem 4.2(a

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Economics 101 Solutions to Problem Set 3 Due Thursday, February 3, 2011 Soojin Kim 1. Nicholson and Snyder problem 4.2. (a) Problem of a young connoisseur Solution She solves the following maximization problem. max w F ,w c w 2 3 F w 1 3 C s.t. 40 w F + 8 w C = 600 . Since at optimum, MRS ij = p i p j , we have U w F U w C = 2 3 w - 1 3 F w 1 3 C 1 3 w 2 3 F w - 2 3 C = 40 8 5 = 2 w C w F 5 w F = 2 w C . Thus, from the budget constraint, we get w * C = 25 and w * F = 10. (b) Eﬀect of change in the price of Bordeaux on the demand for wine Solution Now, we have a diﬀerent budget constraint. max w F ,w C w 2 3 F w 1 3 C s.t. 20 w F + 8 w C = 600 . Under the new price, the demand becomes ( w ** F ,w ** C ) = (20 , 25). (c) Compare utilities in (a) and (b) Solution Note that U ( w * F * c ) = 10 2 3 25 1 3 13 . 57 U ( w ** F ** C ) = 20 2 3 25 1 3 21 . 54 . 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Utility is unambiguously higher in part (b), since the price of wine decreased, which eﬀectively expands the budget set of the wine fancier. In order to ﬁnd the monetary value of this utility increase, let us ask the following question: what is the amount of income I that would leave the wine fancier indiﬀerent between having the price of Bordeaux decline to \$20 (and having budget of \$600) and having the price of Bordeaux at \$40, i.e. what is I such that V (40 , 8 ,I ) = V (20 , 8 , 600)? Suppose the connoisseur had the budget of I to be spent on her wine cellar and the price of Bordeaux were \$40. Then, her optimal choice is ( I 60 , I 24 ) with the associated utility of ( I 60 ) 2 3 ( I 24 ) 1 3 . Thus, the level of I that would leave the connoisseur indiﬀerent to having price of Bordeaux devline to \$20 is I that satisﬁes the following equation: ± I 60 ² 2 3 ± I 24 ² 1 3 = U ( w ** F ,w ** C ) 21 . 54 I 952 . 25 . Thus, if the connoisseur had the budget of \$952 . 25 instead of \$600, she would be indiﬀerent between having the price of wines being ( p F ,p C ) = (40 , 8) and ( p F c ) = (20 , 8) . 2. Suppose Bruce enjoys opera, and while at the opera, champagne. Not surprisingly, better seats at the opera cost more. For simplicity, suppose that all qualities of seats are available, with q denoting the quality of a seat. His utility function is quasilinear, of the form U ( q,c ) = log q + c, where c is his consumption of champagne.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/02/2011 for the course ECON 101 taught by Professor Dannicatambay during the Spring '08 term at UPenn.

Page1 / 8

Ps3_101_2011_solutio - Economics 101 Solutions to Problem Set 3 Due Thursday February 3 2011 Soojin Kim 1 Nicholson and Snyder problem 4.2(a

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online