This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: MATH 8, SECTION 1, WEEK 1 - RECITATION NOTES TA: PADRAIC BARTLETT Abstract. These are the notes from Wednesday, Sept. 29ths lecture. In this talk, we continue our discussion on proofs by contradiction, and examine proofs by induction. 1. Random Question Question 1.1. For any n in N , can you find a way to tile 1 the shape n 2n 2n n n n with triominoes made out of three 1x1 squares of the form ? 2. Administrivia and Announcements Class times will remain at 2-3 MWF for the quarter; while some other time slots are marginally better, none of them are sufficiently better to clear a class change with the Registrar (and running two sections appears to be an impossibility as well.) Sorry, CS1 students! As always, any students who cant make Math 8 consistently are welcome to attend as unregistered students when they can, and read the course notes online. Homework policy! In your Math 1 HW, you cannot cite the Math 8 notes or lectures! Your section TA will have no idea what youre talking about. you can use your Math 8 notes for reference and inspiration! I.e. direct copying of the notes = bad, but using them to remember how a proof goes or some clever trick, and then writing up the results in your own words = good. 1 A tiling of some region R with some shape S is a way of covering all of the points in R with translations, rotations, and reflections of the shape S, so that (1) all of the copies of S lie inside of R, and (2) none of the copies of S overlap (except for possibly on their boundaries.) 1 2 TA: PADRAIC BARTLETT 3. Proofs by Contradiction, Part II Last time, we described proofs by contradiction as the following process: suppose we want to prove that some statement P is true. How can we do this? Well, there are only two possiblities: either P is true, or P is. So: if we show that P is impossible in other words, that assuming P leads to a contradiction then by process of elimination we have tht P must hold! On Monday, we gave one example of a proof by contradiction; today, we have two more proofs to further illustrate the method. Lemma 3.1. (Euclid) There are infinitely many prime numbers. Proof. (N.b.: for the entertainment of those whove already encountered Euclids proof about prime numbers, the proof below is written in the way of prime i.e. all of the words below contain prime numbers of letters. Silly, yes. But fun!) Suppose not: in other words, suppose n prime numbers exist, for n N . Label these prime numbers p 1 ,p 2 ,...p n , and examine the product p 1 p 2 ... p n ....
View Full Document