ma8_wk2_monday_notes_2010

ma8_wk2_monday_notes_2010 - MATH 8, SECTION 1, WEEK 2 -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MATH 8, SECTION 1, WEEK 2 - RECITATION NOTES TA: PADRAIC BARTLETT Abstract. These are the notes from Monday, Oct. 4th’s lecture, where we discussed whether we could define a meaningful concept of “size” for infinite sets. 1. Random Question This is slightly different from the version I posted in class: there, I forgot that we should allow polynomials with an infinite number of positive-indexed terms! Oops. The corrected version is posted below: Question 1.1. Let E = ( ∞ X i =-∞ a i x i : a i ∈ R ) ; in other words, E consists of all of the “generalized” polynomials over R (polynomi- als where you can have both positive and negative coefficients, and possibly infinitely many of either.) Let F be the subset of E made of those polynomials with only finitely many negative-power terms: in other words, let F = { p ( x ) ∈ E : p ( x ) has only finitely many nonzero coefficients attached to negative powers of x. } Define addition and multiplication as normal for elements in F : i.e. ∞ X i =-∞ a i x i ! + ∞ X i =-∞ b i x i ! = ∞ X i =-∞ ( a i + b i ) x i , ∞ X i =-∞ a i x i ! · ∞ X i =-∞ b i x i ! = ∞ X i =-∞ | X infty j =-∞ a j b i- j x i . Define an order relation on F by saying p ( x ) = ∞ X i =-∞ a i x i > iff a i > , where i is the smallest integer such that a i is a nonzero coefficient of p ( x ) . Show that this is an ordered field that contains N , in which N is bounded. 1 2 TA: PADRAIC BARTLETT 2. Sizes of Infinity: Introduction What does it mean for two sets to be the same size? In the finite case, this question is rather trivial; for example, we know that the two sets A = { 1 , 2 , 3 } , B = { A,B, emu } are the same size because they both have the same number of elements – in this case, 3. But what about infinite sets? For example, look at the sets N , Q , R , C ; are any of these sets the same size? Are any of them larger? By how much? In the infinite case, the tools we used for the finite – counting up all of the elements – don’t work. In response to this, we are motivated to try to find another way to count: in this case, one that involves functions ....
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/02/2011.

Page1 / 6

ma8_wk2_monday_notes_2010 - MATH 8, SECTION 1, WEEK 2 -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online