This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: De-Commodification in Social Policy by Gsta Esping-AndersenThe root of modern social policy stem from the process by which both human needs and labor power became commodities.Our well-being depends on our cash-nexus - money paid in wages for commodified labour.The onset (or onslaught) of modern capitalism transformed the structure of social policy.oTraditionally, it was not the labor contract, but the family, the church, or the lord that decided a persons capacity for survival.The rise of capitalism came with the fall of pre-commodified social protection.Capitalism led to the need to satisfy human wants (purchase of commodities) and with that the prominence of purchasing-power and income distribution.When labor power also became a commodity, survival outside the market are at stake.oThis is the most conflictual issue in social policy.The problem of commodification lay at the heart of Marxs analysis of class development: the transformation of independent producers into propertyless wage-earners.oFor Marx, The commodification of labor power implied alienation.Labors commodity has been a central concern of modern philosophy, ideology, and social theory.Classic laissez-faire liberals opposed alternatives to pure cash-nexus because they would disturb the supply and demand equilibrium.oMinimum wage would only make poverty worse.Marxism, on the other hand, had mixed views. oIn some cases, human welfare could only occur with the abolition of wage labor.oIn other cases, social amelioration would bring about decisive change.Traditional conservatism opposed commodifying humanity because it would jeopardize authority and social integration.oThey feared it would lend a blow the old order.The new Poor Laws, amended in 1834, were a social policy intended to make wage employment and the cash-nexus the cornerstone of a persons very existence.Welfare came to depend on the willingness of someone to hire ones labor power.Essentially, it was designed to establish market hegemony in the distribution of welfare.oThe market becomes to the worker a prison within which it is imperative to behave as a commodity in order to survive: there were`no alternatives to property and no state to which human needs can be directed.The commodification of both wants and people may strengthen the engine of capitalism, but it weakens the individual worker. The worker can choose between alternative utilities, jobs, employers, and leisure trade-offs.oBut Marx argued that is freedom behind prison walls, hence an illusion.Workers are not commodities like others because they must survive and reproduce both themselves and the society they live in....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/03/2011 for the course POLI 212 taught by Professor Meadwell during the Spring '08 term at McGill.
- Spring '08