This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Chapter 2: Chapter The Origins of Modern Terrorism Modern Democracies and the Birth of Terrorism in the West of Modern Democracies and the Birth of Terrorism in the West of First use of term terrorism The French Revolution Middle class wrestled power from nobility Extremely bloody power struggle Edmond Burke, British political philosopher, called the revolution “The Reign of Terror” Terrorism = slaughter of French nobles, families, and sympathizers Modern Democracies and the Birth of Terrorism in the West of Radical European democrats of the early 1800’s wanted to eliminate power of upper classes Worked for redistribution of wealth (known as socialists) Believed political power should be held common, wealth belonged to everyone, and all institutions should be democratic Upper/middle classes often equated terrorism and socialism Terrorism and the Anarchists Terrorism Terrorism and the Anarchists Terrorism How the terms Socialism and Anarchy became related Term anarchy originated by Greek philosophers who spoke of eliminating governments By the 1850’s, radical democrats divided into two factions: militant socialists and more peaceful socialists. Both groups referred to their movements as anarchism. Terrorism and the Anarchists Terrorism Proudhon vs. Marx Proudhon: Marx: Called for extension of democracy to all classes through elimination of property and government Believed all government was evil Believed in nonviolent anarchy Saw centralized government as necessary evil Government needed to protect individual rights of citizens Terrorism and the Anarchists Terrorism Major leaders of Anarchist movement Mikhail Bakunin: Russian revolutionary who fought against the tsar; joined by Sergey Nechaev Nikolai Morozov: Primary spokesperson for People’s Will Karl Heinzen: Radical German democratic who advocated political murder Johann Most: Believed that violent action was best form of propaganda; advocated “philosophy of the bomb” Terrorism and the Russian Revolution Revolution Terrorism and the Russian Revolution Revolution Late nineteenthcentury Russia Peasants extremely poor Russia’s economic and governmental systems were insufficient to handle changes brought by industry When Tsar Alexander attempted changes in the system, revolutionary terrorism was the result Terrorism and the Russian Revolution Revolution The People’s Will Motivated by anarchist revolutionary theory of Bakunin and Nechaev Launched in 1870’s, sought to terrorize government, Orthodox church, police, and military into submission Campaign of bombing and murder resulted in killing of Tsar Alexander II in May 1881 Alexander III launched period of national repression; leaders of People’s Will killed or arrested; remaining members went underground People’s Will resurfaced in 1905 revolution but failed to topple Tsar Nicholas II. Terrorism and the Russian Revolution Revolution 1905 revolution of lower classes Russia plagued by economic problems and bureaucratic inefficiency after losing war to Japan Demonstrations by unemployed workers and mutiny by men enlisted in Russian Navy Actions brutally repressed but spirit of revolution simmered Terrorism and the Russian Revolution Revolution The Revolution of 1917 Russians tired of tsar and economic woes; a strike in St. Petersburg became first of two revolutions in 1917 Russian Army joined workers in revolution and new government was formed; these revolutionaries called Mensheviks Russians promised allies to remain in war Germans found help from Lenin Created unrest at home Inspired Germans to attempt to remove Russia from WW I October revolutionaries used terrorist violence to gain power and repressive terrorism to maintain power Lenin gained control of Bolsheviks (Communist revolutionaries who opposed Mensheviks) Orchestrated second revolution in October 1917, which removed Russia from WW I Nationalistic Revolutionaries Nationalistic Nationalistic Revolutionaries Nationalistic 1800s witnessed growth of anarchism and nationalism Goals of nationalist organizations: Use terrorism to wrestle control of government from other nationalities or ethnic groups Nationalists fought to govern, as opposed to anarchists who fought to impose ideology on government Nationalistic Revolutionaries Nationalistic Comparison of nationalistic terrorism and anarchism Both have similar stages of development: learn terrorist tactics and then use them Both groups use similar justifications for violence, claiming moral necessity for their group to govern society Nationalistic Revolutionaries Nationalistic Bell links anarchy and nationalistic traditions using IRA (Irish Republican Army) as example Since 1916, IRA inundated with socialist revolutionaries and nationalists who reject some aspects of socialism Bell believes Ireland is best example of nationalistic terrorism and anarchism as framework of modern European terrorism Nationalistic Revolutionaries Nationalistic Clutterbuck vs. Bell Clutterbuck argues that link between anarchy and nationalistic terror is not so clear Believes nationalistic terrorism in Ireland extremely important because its innovations ushered in practice of modern terrorism Terrorism did not develop as logical step from anarchist violence to modern terrorist practice Ireland set the stage for modern international terrorist operations Irish History and the Growth of Modern Terrorism Modern Irish History and the Growth of Modern Terrorism Modern Why was Ireland ripe for terrorism when IRA was created? Centuries of religious strife since A.D. 800 History of violence through every generation After American Civil War, Irish soldiers who fought for the North joined with other Irish people to create republic of Ireland free from British control. In 1916, this Irish Republican Army tried to take control of Dublin but were defeated by the British Irish History and the Growth of Modern Terrorism Modern Modern terrorism came to Ireland in 1919 Michael Collins took command of IRA and waged fierce campaign against British Collins studied tactics of Russian revolutionaries, and his followers used bombs, murder, ambushes, and other terrorist tactics to fight Protestant police force and British army. Ireland gained independence in 1921 but British held the north of Ireland Collins was killed in 1922 by former revolutionaries opposing peace with the British. After his death, IRA outlawed by Republic of Ireland. Irish History and the Growth of Modern Terrorism Modern Role of British army in rebirth of IRA As violence grew in Northern Ireland after failed Catholic civil rights movement, British sent army to stop rioting Young soldiers sided with loyalists against Republicans and brutally repressed Catholics Irish History and the Growth of Modern Terrorism Modern IRA Tactics From 19701990, bombing was primary tactic Murder Kidnapping Killing adversaries at established roadblocks Assassination of government officials, enemy terrorists, Catholics advocating compromise, police officers, and soldiers The Influence of Past Experience The The Influence of Past Experience The Dyson’s conclusions about terrorist behavior Unlike criminals, terrorists study the history of past campaigns and the theory that motivated them Counterterrorism starts with understanding the roots of terrorism The Influence of Past Experience The Issues shaping modern terrorism: The ideology of modern terrorism emerged from 19th century revolutionary thought Such thought spawned revolutions in Russia, and influenced Michael Collins to apply the same tactics to Ireland’s nationalistic revolution Terrorists in the 20th century studied Michael Collins and improvised from IRA tactics The Influence of Past Experience The Current terrorist networks: Today, terrorism is dominated by religion, ideologies serving as surrogate religions, and racial/ethnic divisions Roots of selfproclaimed ‘religious terrorists’ are in traditions of Lenin and Collins ...
View Full Document
- Summer '08