Unformatted text preview: Chapter 3: Changing Group Structures and the Metamorphosis of Terrorism of Trying to Walk the Walk Trying Trying to Walk the Walk Trying The New World Liberation Front (NWLF) Formed in San Francisco (1970) Responsible for 30 bombings over next seven years Claimed to be a “moral” revolutionary group, attacking only “legitimate” targets such as utility companies Considered themselves at war with the establishment Trying to Walk the Walk Trying NWLF’s attempts to expand Few new recruits willing to join so they ‘expanded’ by forming a number of brigades In a final ploy to gain support, NWLF joined up with prison reform movement and allied with Tribal Thumb This alliance cemented their failure due to association with violent felons; lost all public support Tribal Thumb was a group of militant exconvicts Trying to Walk the Walk Trying Why many modern terrorist groups fail: In order to have effect, terrorist groups have to be large To become large, group needs popular/political appeal Need a cause that is acceptable to a large segment of the public Most terrorist groups do not have this appeal and thus fail Group Size and Campaign Length Group Group Size and Campaign Length Group Ted Robert Gurr’s analysis of terrorist groups Most terrorist actions involve only a few people who generate more noise than injury The majority of successful groups embrace doctrines such as nationalism or religion Large terrorist groups are more successful than small groups Group Size and Campaign Length Group Length of Terrorist Campaigns: Most terrorist campaigns end within 18 months of the initial outburst of violence Terrorism is shortlived because it seldom generates support Group Size and Campaign Length Group Implications of Gurr’s Analysis Conclusions imply that most terrorist organizations are small, shortlived operations IF terrorism is the result of a popular social issue, the power of the group is enhanced Strong support for a group is more important than the actual number of operatives Group Size is Important Group Group Size is Important Group Italian Terrorist Groups Between 1975 and 1985, there was a large number of terrorist actions in Italy Only large groups involved in sustained actions/terrorist campaigns Everything else was ‘single incident’ terrorism Group Size is Important Group Hezbollah Serves as example of large successful group Began as political group In 1982, moved to Bekaa Valley in Lebanon Hezbollah is large enough to maintain a campaign, and religion provides common base among its members Group Size is Important Group Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elaam (LTTE) LTTE is bound by nationalism and ethnic identity LTTE began fighting Sri Lankan government in 1976 Claimed to represent Tamil minority May have up to 10,000 members Group Size is Important Group Terrorist Campaigns After WW II Campaigns of large terrorist organizations accounted for majority of world terrorism Large terrorist organizations have prompted governments to employ macropolicies Large groups represent political threats Group Size is Important Group Values Vs. Large Base of Support Most terrorists try to hide their most radical positions and sensationalistic violence to appeal to a broader base Creating Terrorist Organizations Creating Creating Terrorist Organizations Pyramid Organization: Support is most common job in terrorist groups Fraser and Fulton’shierarchy of terrorist group: Smallest group at the top is responsible for command Second level is active cadre—people who carry out organization’s mission Third level is most important: active supporters Fourth level is passive supporters; largest group Creating Terrorist Organizations Creating Anthony Burton’s Structure of Subunits: Terrorist organizations have two primary types of subunits: The most basic unit is the cell. Composed of 46 people and specialized as tactical or intelligence section Groups of cells create columns, which are semiautonomous groups with a variety of specialties and a single command structure
Cell Column New Models for a New Day New New Models for a New Day New Umbrella Organization Several smaller pyramids gather under sheltering group that Manages supplies Obtains resources Creates support structures Gathers intelligence Sheltering umbrella disassociated from violence, casting a blind eye when semiautonomous pyramid groups take action New Models for a New Day New Organizations that emerged in the 1990s: Virtual organizations were created through computer and information networks Chain organizations linked separate groups with similar philosophies or religions without creating hierarchy Centralized hubs developed to manage or support individual cells “Leaderless resistance”—groups or individuals operating on their own New Models for a New Day New New Organizational Styles: As organizations change, network provides strength Network is supported by larger nonviolent following Role of force multipliers dominates terrorism Motivated by nationalistic, ethnic, or religions concerns The Problems of Managing Organizations Organizations The Problems of Managing Organizations Organizations Special organizational problems: Secrecy Decentralization Training Internal Discipline Gaining immediate tactical support for operations The Problems of Managing Organizations Organizations Bodansky’s types of activities accompanying terrorist campaigns: Intelligence—includes everything from selection/observation of targets to forging of documentation/travel papers Direct logistical network—established to supply terrorists with weapons Support network—for safe houses, transportation, food sources, and medical supplies The Problems of Managing Organizations Organizations Terrorist attacks require political support, planning, organization, and resources The Individual: The Ultimate Small Group Group The Individual: The Ultimate Small Group Group Technology and the individual: A technological structure can be changed into a weapon if attacked For the first time in history, a single individual can become a lone force of significant destruction Examples: power grid, fuel distribution system, computer network The Individual: The Ultimate Small Group Group Jessica Stern and the disturbing trend in terrorism: Terrorists motivated by religion are gathering into loose groups with no leader Many groups are virtual organizations held together by ideology and information The Individual: The Ultimate Small Group Group Louis Beam A rightwing extremist leader involved with Ku Klux Klan and Aryan Nations Believed that a group could not evade law enforcement, so he called for elimination of organizations The Individual: The Ultimate Small Group Group “Leaderless Resistance” Extremist groups do not need extensive organizations Examples: Only necessary to take action Green Party extremists in Germany Animal Liberation Front Timothy McVeigh The Individual: The Ultimate Small Group Group Lone Wolf In the rightwing fantasy novel Hunter, protagonist (individual) serves as example of how an individual extremist can murder people of color and Jews in the name of White supremacy Eric Rudolph—charged in connection with 4 bombings ranging from 1996 Atlanta Olympics to 1998 abortion clinic bombing The Individual: The Ultimate Small Group Group Berserker White defines berserkers as crazed, frightened true believers Can leave a trail of clues ...
View Full Document
- Summer '08
- group size, Small Group Group, Ultimate Small Group