{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}


Terrorism_Powerpoints_17 - Chapter Seventeen Chapter The...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Chapter Seventeen: Chapter The Bureaucracy of The Homeland Security Homeland Bureaucracy: The Weberian Ideal Weberian Bureaucracy: The Weberian Ideal Max Weber Max Weber coined the term bureaucracy to describe professional, rational organizations People organize for a purpose and their organizations should accomplish that purpose The process is rational: There is a problem, people organize to solve it, they work together, and the problem is solved Bureaucracy should be designed to accomplish specific purposes Bureaucracy: The Weberian Ideal The ideal bureaucracy In Weber’s ideal, labor is to be divided into specific functions or bureaus, and all the bureaus or functions of the organization are to assemble logically to produce the whole Modern bureaucratic management ideally comes from leaders who excel at leadership Every aspect of the organization centers on rational efficiency Bureaucracy: The Weberian Ideal Views concerning the expanded homeland security bureaucracy Supporters of one position maintain that consolidating power is efficient. They argue that a large bureaucracy with a clear mission will empower the security forces to perform their mission Proponents of a second position suggest that decentralizing power personalizes services and helps develop links to communities. They believe localized, informal offices are more adept at recognizing and handling problems The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence Intelligence The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence The lead agency for counterterrorism: FBI Under Director Robert Mueller the FBI’s charge is to prevent terrorism The FBI is to coordinate intelligence gathering and sharing activities with the Border Patrol, Secret Service, and CIA The FBI is to operate as partners with state and local law enforcement. Finally, since the FBI is in the Department of Justice, it is to coordinate activities with DHS and the Department of Defense The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence and A new role for the CIA Originally, the CIA was supposed to be the agency that would coordinate al U.S. intelligence data The CIA was to operate apart from U.S. criminal law Today, the CIA is to cooperate fully with the FBI on counterterrorism intelligence The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence and The Department of Homeland Security DHS is also charged with counterterrorism DHS includes law enforcement agencies, such as the Secret Service, the Border Patrol, the new Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the U.S. Customs Service, and other agencies It has its own military, and its own intelligence section The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence and Department of Defense The DOD augments civilian defense, provides special operation capabilities, and interdicts terrorists before they arrive in the United States The main military role in counterterrorism is to project American power overseas The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence and The array of American power In theory, led by the FBI and the CIA, multiple agencies will work together to gain information, analyze it together, and share the results with every bureaucracy concerned with homeland security The FBI and the CIA are to create a cooperative, sharing atmosphere with thousands of state and local law enforcement agencies DHS calls on the entire system of homeland security bureaucracies to form relations with local communities and private industry Protecting the Borders Protecting Protecting the Borders Protecting Agencies protecting the American borders The Secret Service The Coast Guard Customs and Border Protection Immigration and Customs Enforcement The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center The Office of Domestic Preparedness The Transportation Security Administration Protecting the Borders Protecting Areas of vulnerability on the American borders Long stretches of unprotected areas along the northern and southern borders are open to infiltration More than three hundred seaports must be secured The DHS has agencies responsible for securing entry into the United States at airports, and it is responsible for protecting air travel once the entry points are protected Border agents are responsible for staffing entry points along the northern and southern borders Another DHS agency has the task of accounting for noncitizens within U.S. Borders Protecting the Borders Protecting DHS protecting the borders DHS cooperates with the FBI and CIA DHS has increased the number of people who patrol the border DHS uses technology, such as biometric measuring­­ that is, identification systems based on body characteristics such as finger prints, facial patterns, or DNA Protecting the Borders Protecting Criticisms of DHS activities Activities may not be effective Some DHS policies have not been popular with other countries Many local governments feel they need the tryst and cooperation of foreigners living in their areas Protecting the Borders Protecting 9­11 Commission Report’s recommendations for border security A single agency should screen crossings with a single format An investigative agency should be established to monitor aliens in the United States The DHS should gather intelligence on the way terrorists travel, and combine intelligence and law enforcement activities to hamper their mobility There should be a standardize method for obtaining identification and wanted passports using biometric measures Infrastructure Protection Infrastructure Infrastructure Protection Infrastructure Identification and protection of critical infrastructures DHS states that law enforcement agencies will need to develop cooperative links with public and private bureaucracies, including private security organizations, educational institutions, and health care systems Infrastructure Protection Infrastructure Criticisms Too little is being done A year after September 11, the federal government had failed to release resources to state and local governments Federal law enforcement does little to assist private security Infrastructure Protection Richard Clarke’s threats facing the nation of infrastructures Most computer systems are vulnerable to viruses The nation’s power system and technological organizations that support it are vulnerable to disruptions The Internet and computer networks that support these systems are vulnerable to attack Infrastructure Protection Infrastructure Protection of the infrastructure According to Clarke, the state and local law enforcement should not play the leading role in infrastructure protection Protection of the infrastructure comes when specialists in crime fighting and protection establish critical links with the public and private organizations serving America’s infrastructure The police should be linked to security forces already associated with infrastructure functions State and local law enforcement agencies must establish formal and informal networks withthe organizations in their jurisdictions, and these networks should expand to a cooperative federal system DHS, Security, and Police Work Police DHS, Security, and Police Work DHS, Local law enforcement agencies The IACP believes that local law enforcement agencies will become the hinge on which all local efforts pivot Homeland security entails coordinating efforts from several local organizations, including private industry, public service, health care systems, and law enforcement As local agencies become involved in homeland security, they must become involved in assessing threats in their jurisdictions. They must also learn to recognize possible items that may add to national defense intelligence and develop routines to forward such information DHS, Security, and Police Work DHS, Police and gathering defense intelligence The process of gathering defense intelligence is not readily apparent in American policing Police work is political, and law enforcement officers think locally DHS, Security, and Police Work DHS, Abstract reasoning skills State and local officers are not rewarded for thinking in terms of international issues or national security Chiefs and sheriffs do not usually praise abstract reasoning, and higher education has done little to help this situation Criminal justice programs do not produce abstract, critical thinkers for law enforcement To combat terrorism, security forces require groups of people with abstract reasoning skills, knowledge of international politics and history, and specialized expertise in particular regions. However, the ethos behind policing rejects this logic Possible Approaches for Homeland Security Bureaucracies Bureaucracies Possible Approaches for Homeland Security Bureaucracies Security Legal alternatives to police participation in homeland defense Gathering security information in the course of criminal investigations Combine training in alertness with specialized training for selected officers Possible Approaches for Homeland Security Bureaucracies Security The FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) The JTTF combines local, state, and various federal police officers, as well as corrections officials and prosecutors, in regional units designed to combat terrorism Possible Approaches for Homeland Security Bureaucracies Security Opposition to the JTTF Local governments have refused to allow their police forces to assist in counterterrorist activities Civil libertarians see the formation of a JTTF as too great of a consolidation of government power State and federal courts may well limit the role of local agencies in homeland security Possible Approaches for Homeland Security Bureaucracies Security Other democracies who have had their police engage in intelligence gathering activities and have expanded their role in national defense France Germany Canada The British Bureaucratic Inhibitors Bureaucratic Bureaucratic Inhibitors Bureaucratic Public service organizations have foibles that emerge in the everyday social construction of reality The FBI versus Police and Sheriff’s Departments Many state and local police executives do not trust the FBI, and the attitude extends down through the ranks of law enforcement agencies The relationship between the FBI and state and local law enforcement must improve Bureaucratic Inhibitors Bureaucratic Federal Law Enforcement Rivalries Organizations on every level frequently act out of self­interest rather than concern with an overall mission Advocates of Local Control Some people feel cooperation between state and local law enforcement will result in the de fact concentration of police power Bureaucratic Inhibitors Bureaucratic The Problem of Legal Bureaucracy The criminal justice system is actually not a system at all, but a multifaceted bureaucracy with intersecting layers While police and correctional institutions represent the executive branch of the government, the courts autonomously belong to the judicial branch Bureaucratic Inhibitors Bureaucratic The Bureaucracy Problem Change can happen, and may even be welcome, if federal agencies enter into cooperative relationships with their local counterparts Large organizations are difficult to manage, and problems increase rapidly when organizational effectiveness requires cooperation on several levels If the DHS can create effective partnerships with intelligence and law enforcement agencies on the federal level, it could focus attention on these issues. However, homeland security becomes a problem much larger than gathering and analyzing information The problem appears in preventing terrorism, and preventing requires bureaucratic change Stephen Flynn’s Critique of the Ideal of Stephen Flynn’s Critique of the Ideal of Two mistakes made by the United States Homeland security has been separated from national security The infrastructure is vulnerable to attack Homeland security should be part of a national strategy to defend the United States Stephen Flynn’s Critique of the Ideal of Weapons of mass destruction According to the CIA, the most likely scenario for smuggling weapons of mass destruction into the United States is by sea The Bush administration has done very little to protect the nation’s 361 seaports Stephen Flynn’s Critique of the Ideal of The nation’s infrastructure In the 2005 military budget, the infrastructure for the entire nation will receive only $2.6 billion, whereas the DOD was allotted $7.6 billion Flynn sees a problem in strategic thinking in DHS and other agencies Increased border protection will not protect America against terrorist attacks Stephen Flynn’s Critique of the Ideal of Jihadists are aware of the vulnerabilities in the infrastructure The safest and most effective way to hit America is to strike the infrastructure Reinvent homeland security DHS and other federal bureaucracies should think of security from a broad perspective Stephen Flynn’s Critique of the Ideal of Flynn’s recommendations for the future The best current model for homeland security is the air industry When bureaucracies recover from failure, people will believe in their own safety and continue to function Americans must be able to absorb a major attack and continue to function ...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online