Chapter 11

Chapter 11 - Chapter 11: Community Corrections-Probation...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Chapter 11: Community Corrections-Probation and Intermediate Sanctions Community Corrections: Assumption • Four factors that support community corrections • Many offender’s criminal records and current defenses are not serious enough to warrant incarceration • Community supervision is cheaper than incarceration • Rates of recidivism or returning to crime for those under community supervision are no higher for those who go to prison • Ex-inmates require both support and supervision as they try to remake their lives in the community Probation: Correction without Incarceration - developed by John Augustus persuaded judge to give him custody of convictd offender for brief period and helped man appear rehabilitated • Probation is the conditional release of the offender into the community under the supervision of correctional officials • Can be combined with other sanctions such as fines, restitution, and community service • The court that sentences the person to probation has authority over the probationer and if he/she violates the conditions or commits another crime, the judge can order the entire sentence to be served in prison • The number of people on probation is at a record high • Public see it as a “slap on the wrist” Origins and Evolution of Probation • Started out as giving people a second chance • Psychology led to a change of emphasis on therapeutic counseling, which brought about three changes • The officer no longer acted primarily as a community supervisor charged with enforcing a particular morality • Officer became more of a clinical social worker • Offender expected to become actively involved in treatment • Primary goal is the pursuit of rehabilitation this changed again in the 70s to risk management (the goal is to minimize the probability that an offender will commit a new offense) Organization of Probation • Falls under the executive branch but in about 25% of the states, probation falls to the county and local governments • The state sets the standards but the local government administers the programs • States combine probation and parole services to maximize their resources • Works best when the judge and the supervising officer have a close relationship
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/06/2011 for the course CCJS 100 taught by Professor Gaston during the Spring '07 term at Maryland.

Page1 / 4

Chapter 11 - Chapter 11: Community Corrections-Probation...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online