This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: IMPOSSIBLE iv. True premises & logically true yet false conclusionIMPOSSIBLE IV. Logically Inconsistent Propositions a. A set of propositions is logically inconsistent if and only is it is impossible for all the member of the set to be true at the same time V. Validity and Logically Inconsistent Premises a. A set of premises can be logically inconsistent b. Any argument with inconsistent premises is valid c. Examples: i. Inconsistent yet all true premises & true conclusion IMPOSSIBLE ii. Inconsistent premises & true conclusion VALID iii. Inconsistent premises & false conclusion VALID iv. Inconsistent yet all true premises & false conclusion IMPOSSIBLE MAIN POINTS • Any argument with a logically true conclusion is valid • Any argument with logically inconsistent premises is valid...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 03/03/2011 for the course PHIL 100 taught by Professor Forte during the Fall '08 term at Bridgewater State University.
 Fall '08
 FORTE

Click to edit the document details