BertaIPBSReply (p)

BertaIPBSReply (p) - Integr Psych Behav (2008) 42:121127 DOI

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
REPLY Voice as Materialistic Principle Marie-Cécile Bertau Published online: 13 February 2008 # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract In this reply, three core notions from Schürmann s comment The materiality of the abstraction voice are picked out and discussed: the ethos, the so called trialogical self and vocality as principle. The notion of ethos is explored through the word s history, coming to say that ethos develops in relation to a certain geographical place and is determined by the social practices of a historically situated community. Thus, the concept allows to see how current scientific activities are rooted in reality, taken in the socio-cultural sense. The trialogical self is discussed in its implications, leading to firmly retain dialogical self as sign of a movement leading through the other to self. Schürmann s distinction of voice as phenomenon and vocality as principle is seen as fruitful supplement to own ideas, especially as it highlights the fact that it is the act of uttering in different modes which matters for a language notion based in addressivity. Keywords Ethos . Dialogical self . Vocality . Interiorization . Utterance Volker Schürmann s comment The materiality of the abstraction voice can be read as organized around three core notions: the ethos, the so called trialogical self and vocality as principle. From these, the notion of ethos stands out, pointing to a crucial procedure in science, where empirical data is generated on the ground of non- empirical concepts, which themselves belong to a decision based in an ethos. Taking the term of ethos in current psychological discussion into account is in my opinion quite important, it can prevent from all too rapid ontologization where dogmatism is easy to emerge; it forces to reflect the concepts put into empirical work as historically formed and situated, thus to contextualize them; finally, its consequence is to take empiry more seriously: it commits the ones who espoused a certain ethos to a very thoughtful treatment of data, for the very reason that one is aware of the way they are generated. The investigating subject is fully responsible, it cannot use Integr Psych Behav (2008) 42:121 127 DOI 10.1007/s12124-008-9055-x M.-C. Bertau ( * ) Institut für Psycholinguistik, Universität München, Oettingenstrasse 67, 80538 München, Germany e-mail: [email protected]
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
empiry to dismiss him/herself, rather stay with empiry and his/her perspective. So, one has not the right to just tell any story about that data (Schürmann 2008 , ms. p.9). Relativity does not lead to arbitrary, but to a conscious choice of the relation taken to reality, and this is indeed a political question in the broad and in the narrow sense. The notion of the trialogical self is introduced by Schürmann as one of the
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/06/2011 for the course PSYCH 212 taught by Professor Dansullivan during the Spring '11 term at NYU.

Page1 / 7

BertaIPBSReply (p) - Integr Psych Behav (2008) 42:121127 DOI

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online