Jeremy DoncouseLGLS298Problem 1 on page 530Question 22.8 on page 55211/16/2008Problem 1 on page 530:Does an agreement in which SSS, Inc requires the purchase of a service agreement in conjunction with the purchase of component parts with ABC Manufacturing violate antitrust law? This kind of arrangement, known as a tying arrangement, does violate antitrust law. Section 3 of the Clayton Act prohibits tying arrangements, vertical trade restraints, forcing a buyer to purchase two products in conjunction with each other. Section 1 of the Sherman Act forbids, under restraints of trade, tying arrangements involving goods, services, intangible property, and real property. When SSS, Inc required ABC Manufacturing to purchase a service contract, a service, to compliment ABC’s purchase of component parts, goods, SSS is trying to force ABC into a tying arrangement.Question 22.8 on page 552:Miller-Brewing Company has made Miller Lite beer since the 1970s. Falstaff Brewing Corporation has been making Falstaff Lite since July 11, 1980.
This is the end of the preview.
access the rest of the document.