This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Ttest: means of Spock's judge versus all other judges 1 12:10 Wednesday, January 5, 2011 The TTEST Procedure Variable: pcwomen judge1 N Mean Std Dev Std Err Minimum Maximum OTHER 37 29.4919 7.4308 1.2216 16.5000 48.9000 SPOCKS 9 14.6222 5.0388 1.6796 6.4000 23.1000 Diff (12) 14.8697 7.0564 2.6227 judge1 Method Mean 95% CL Mean Std Dev OTHER 29.4919 27.0144 31.9694 7.4308 SPOCKS 14.6222 10.7491 18.4954 5.0388 Diff (12) Pooled 14.8697 9.5840 20.1553 7.0564 Diff (12) Satterthwaite 14.8697 10.4994 19.2400 judge1 Method 95% CL Std Dev OTHER 6.0428 9.6523 SPOCKS 3.4035 9.6532 Diff (12) Pooled 5.8417 8.9137 Diff (12) Satterthwaite Method Variances DF t Value Pr > t Pooled Equal 44 5.67 <.0001 Satterthwaite Unequal 17.608 7.16 <.0001 Equality of Variances Method Num DF Den DF F Value Pr > F Folded F 36 8 2.17 0.2482 Regression: Spock's judge versus all other judges 2 12:10 Wednesday, January 5, 2011 The REG Procedure Model: MODEL1 Dependent Variable: pcwomen Number of Observations Read 46 Number of Observations Used 46 Analysis of Variance Sum of Mean Source DF Squares Square F Value Pr > F Model 1 1600.62290 1600.62290 32.15 <.0001 Error 44 2190.90312 49.79325 Corrected Total 45 3791.52603 Root MSE 7.05643 RSquare 0.4222 Dependent Mean 26.58261 Adj RSq 0.4090 Coeff Var 26.54530 Parameter Estimates Parameter Standard Variable DF Estimate Error t Value Pr > t Intercept 1 29.49189 1.16007 25.42 <.0001 ispocks 1 14.86967 2.62266 5.67 <.0001 Regression (GLM): Spock's judge versus all other judges 3 12:10 Wednesday, January 5, 2011 The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values judge1 2 OTHER SPOCKS Number of Observations Read 46 Number of Observations Used 46 Regression (GLM): Spock's judge versus all other judges 4 12:10 Wednesday, January 5, 2011 The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: pcwomen Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 1 1600.622903 1600.622903 32.15 <.0001 Error 44 2190.903124 49.793253 Corrected Total 45 3791.526027 RSquare Coeff Var Root MSE pcwomen Mean 0.422158 26.54530 7.056433 26.58261 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F judge1 1 1600.622903 1600.622903 32.15 <.0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F judge1 1 1600.622903 1600.622903 32.15 <.0001 Standard Parameter Estimate Error t Value Pr > t Intercept 14.62222242 B 2.35214448 6.22 <.0001 judge1 OTHER 14.86966939 B 2.62266034 5.67 <.0001 judge1 SPOCKS 0.00000000 B . . ....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 03/11/2011 for the course STA 303 taught by Professor Alison during the Spring '11 term at University of Toronto.
 Spring '11
 alison

Click to edit the document details