This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: They argued four main facts in relation to due diligence, carelessness and the emphasis on generating revenue from new clients rather than properly budgeting for audits. 2. Coopers, the defendant, demanded that this was a massive fraud perpetrated by Phar-Mor’s management. They illustrated that the fraud was a collusive effort by multiple individuals within the upper management of the company who continually worked to hide evidence form the auditors. Their attorney stated “It’s a first. . that effectively turns outside auditors into insurers against crooked management.”...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/16/2011 for the course ACG 4632 taught by Professor Falk during the Spring '09 term at FSU.
- Spring '09