Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: SOCIAL PROCESS THEORIES SOCIAL CONTROL 08/06/2010 16:10:00 ← Assumptions of Social Control Theories • People are inherently bad> born bad, learn to be good • Behaviors and passions are internally and externally controlled • People are rational>people have the decision to commit crime • People adhere to a dominant, stable normative system ← ← Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory: ← Key Concept: • Social Bonds refer to ties a person has to the institutions and processes of society (ex: broken homes) o Why DON’T they do it, is the question asked ← Major Premise: • A persons bond to society prevents him or her from violating the law • If the bond weakens the person is free to commit crime ← 4 Elements of the Bond • Attachment- sensitivity to/interest in others (family,teachers,friends) more about attachment, not the person attached to. o More attachments=less likely to commit crime • Commitment=has to do with rational component, degree to which a persons social rewards (e.g. wealth) are tied to conventional actions • Involvement=amount of time devoted to conventional activities, if your busy you don’t have time to commit crime • Belief=internalization of conventional norms aka respect for the law ← ← Causal Structure: (-) Strength of ------------------------ Criminal Behavior the Social Bond ← ← Empirical Research: • Attachment, commitment and belief have consistent effects on delinquent behavior o Sex did not matter in results, but girls were more attached • Involvement rarely shows significant effect o Sports was not very effective, depends on activity. • Delinquent peer associations exert significant effects even holding constant social bonds • Delinquent behavior weakens certain social bonds (e.g. attachment to school) and not vice versa • Reverse causal order between delinquent peers and delinquency (i.e. social selection process) ← Belief did not matter as much as attachment and involvement ← ← Evaluation • Neglects relative importance of bands elements> some were more effective than others, but he did not specify the importance • Some social attachments are detrimental> not all attachments are good, went back and said what kind and who matters as well. • Modes of criminality> defines minor delinquency better than major and better defines females than males. • Effects of time (or age) are not considered> social bonds change with time. Developmental age • Temporal order problem> attachment was strong until you got caught doing something bad then it decreased ← ←...
View Full Document

  • Summer '11
  • SandraBlount
  • Empirical research, Sutherland, self control, Social control theories, Social Learning Theories, Social Bond Empirical Research

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 11


This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online