interview

interview - Jackson and Ross Interview Interview Script M...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Jackson and Ross Interview Interview Script M ihi r Thakkar 3/25/2010 I had a chance to sit down with President Andrew Jackson to discuss about the new Indian Removal Act. He seemed very happy about the bill and gave arguments that it was in the best interest of the Indians and the United States. I also had the chance to meet with John Ross, the Cherokee Chief. He believes that his people have been cheated by this act, and is doing anything to repeal it. This is what they had to say. Mihir: Mr. Ross, why do you believe that you were cheated by the American Government? Ross: “After the official Cherokee Delegation had departed for Washington, a contract was made by the Rev. John F. Schermerhorn, and certain individual Cherokees, claiming to be a ‘treaty’ concluded at New Echota on the 29 th day of December, 1835, between commissioners on the part of the United States, and the chiefs headmen, and people of the Cherokee t ribes of Indians. A spurious Delegation, in violation of the rules of the General Council of the Cherokee nation, proceeded to Washington City with this pretended treaty, and by false and fraudulent representations convinced the US government that they were legal and accredited Delegation of the Cherokee people, and obtained this treaty of New Echota.” (Ross pg. 1 par. 2) Mihir: Didn’t the Cherokee Nation already have a treaty with the United States Government? Ross: “A treaty, ratified by the Senate, and approved by the President, and our acquiescence in its requirements demanded, under the sanction of the displeasure of the United States, and the treat of armed conflict, in case of refusal.” (Ross pg. 1 par. 2) Mihir: Why do you believe this is such a bad treaty? What makes it so aggravating?Mihir: Why do you believe this is such a bad treaty?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/15/2011 for the course ENG 101 taught by Professor Sierra during the Spring '08 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 6

interview - Jackson and Ross Interview Interview Script M...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online