Constitutional Law Outline.Durchslag

Constitutional Law Outline.Durchslag - Constitutional Law...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Constitutional Law Outline 6 questions for cases: 1.) What are the issues 2.) What caused the case (What’s so important about the case?) 3.) All Con Law cases begin with some action by the government, what’s the source of authority for that action? 4.) What’s the basis of the claim which constrains that gov’t action? 5.) Which approach is constitutionally better, and why? It’s often difficult to separate politics and law (lawyers have to frame legal questions, not political ones.) The parties involved are different Constitutional questions limit political action/reasons. Issues of power and authority, does the govt have the power/auth. to do the rule they set forth? If not, why not? Where does the authority come from? Where does the court fit into the whole equation? Marbury v. Madison (1803) John Jay 1 st Chief Justice, John Marshall the 2 nd . Case establishes the role of supreme court. Marbury appointed by Adams to be JOP for DC. Is denied appointment by Jefferson administration since the commission wasn’t delivered by sec. of state under Adams (Marshall). Congress passes statute granting Pres. the authority to appoint JOP / Fed. Judges. Congress gains this power in Article 1, section 8, clause 17-18. Marbury’s lawyers file this case directly to SC for writ of mandeamus (orders civil servant to perform some specific action.) The civil servant in this case (Madison) is the sec. of state under Jefferson. Jefferson refuses to deliver the commission. The new congress (now lead by the republicans) repeals Judiciary act. Where does Marbury get authority to go directly to SC? Judicary Act of 1789. Section 13 codifies SC’s ability to issue writs of mand. Congress granted power to enact Judicary Act under art. III, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution. Holding in Marbury: P due commission, but since commission no longer exists he’s SOL.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
SC didn’t have the power to order writ since section 13 of Judicary act is unconstitutional. Violates Article 3(2)(2). Since law is void, SC doesn’t have authority to hear his case.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/18/2011 for the course ECON 101 taught by Professor Silviaprina during the Spring '08 term at Case Western.

Page1 / 5

Constitutional Law Outline.Durchslag - Constitutional Law...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online