Fantz - Crain, W. (2005). Theories of development: Concepts...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Crain, W. (2005). Theories of development: Concepts and Applications 5th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Nature vs . Nurture Arnold Gesell’s theory of development places a large emphasis on the role of biology and genetics; therefore, in terms of the nature versus nurture debate, Gesell’s theory would lend support to the nature side of the debate in which innate factors such as genetics are thought to be largely responsible for an individual’s development. In fact, a central concept of Arnold Gesell’s theory is Maturation, which is defined as a genetically determined process of growth that occurs naturally. A lthough Gesell concedes that both a child’s environment and their genetics play fundamental roles in a child’s development; the following quote appearing on page 23 of William Crain’s Theories of Development: Concepts and Applications clearly illustrates that Gesell emphasizes the role of nature over nurture: Two major forces, Gesell said, influence the child’s growth or development. First, the child is a product of his or her environment. But more fundamentally, Gesell believed, that the child’s development is directed from within, by the action of genes. Gesell called this process maturation Even when Gesell acknowledges the role of environment by specifically referring to aspects of the prenatal environment such as temperature and oxygen, he specifically states that such environmental factors “play no direct role in the sequential unfolding of structures and action patterns.” (Crain, 2011, 23) Passive vs. Active In regards to the debate of whether individuals are passive or active participants in their own development, Gesell’s heavy emphasis on genetics and universal sequences of development clearly suggest that according to his theory individuals are passive in their development. Gesell even posits that variances in rates of development are “largely controlled by the internal genetic mechanism’ Gesell, 1945, p. 61” As an example Gesell refers to the fact that in prenatal development the heart develops, then the CNS, then the arms and legs etc. Furthermore, Gesell emphasizes the fact that a child’s development should not be hurried along because a variety of abilities such as sitting, walking, talking all dependent on sufficient maturation. “ Because of intrinsic self-regulating processes, children sometimes resist our efforts to teach them new things. It is as if something inside tells them not to learn too much too soon. The integrity of the organism must be preserved.” (Crain, 2010, p. 28) Discontinuous vs. Continuous Gesell’s theory of development can best be perceived as featuring a discontinuous process in which change is qualitative rather than a continuous process in which change is quantitative. For example, a defining feature discontinuous process of development is that development is thought
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/23/2011 for the course PSYCHOLOGY 512 taught by Professor K during the Fall '10 term at S. Connecticut.

Page1 / 11

Fantz - Crain, W. (2005). Theories of development: Concepts...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online