This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: pare it with the signal constellation of BPAM and BPPM. 5. What can you infer from the above comparison about the BEP of BFSK (with coherent demodulation), BPAM, and BPPM? BFl, TPe. Digital Modulation 1 NavCom Digital Modulation 1  Problem Set 5 Problem 2 (Transformation of a WGN vector) Let W = ( W 1 , W 2 ) denote a 2dimensional white Gaussian noise vector (WGNV) with component variance σ 2 , i.e. W 1 ∼ N (0 , σ 2 ) and W 2 ∼ N (0 , σ 2 ). The components ˜ W 1 and ˜ W 2 of the WGNV with respect to a rotated system of coordinates (see the Fgure below) can be obtained from W 1 and W 2 by the linear transformation ˜ W 1 = W 1 cos α + W 2 sin α, ˜ W 2 = − W 1 sin α + W 2 cos α. Show that ˜ W = ( ˜ W 1 , ˜ W 2 ) is also a WGNV with component variance σ 2 . α ˜ ξ 2 ξ 2 ˜ W 1 α W ˜ W 2 ˜ ξ 1 W 2 ξ 1 W 1 B±l, TPe. Digital Modulation 1 NavCom...
View
Full Document
 Spring '10
 TTTTT
 Phaseshift keying, Digital modulation, BFSK, WGNV, frequency separation

Click to edit the document details