Unformatted text preview: F ( s ), but if the function has poles on or to the left of the jω axis, then there is no further restriction due to F ( s ). 4. Next deFne the even more weird notation: f (( t ) T ≡ s n =∞ f ( tnT ) . Does this make sense? If so, why, if not why not? Sol: This function is not causal due to the “tail” of f ( t ) that extends beyond t = 0. I want to think more about this case. I just put one of my feet higher on the physics ladder, but haven’t yet put the other on the math ladder. 1.1 More on Riemann 1. State the Riemann Hypothesis. Hint: Look this up on Wikipedia. ˜ /493/Assignments/HW #12 – Version 1.0 ±ebruary 21, 2011 1...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2011 for the course ECE ECE 493 taught by Professor Jontb.allen during the Spring '11 term at University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
 Spring '11
 JontB.Allen

Click to edit the document details