This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Follow up through time. Case control studiesstarting with outcome (i.e. obesity), then find similar people who are not obese, then go back in time to see some similarities in the past Ecological Studiesecological fallacy. We can take population data, and apply to individual. Japanese people eat fish, low coronary heart disease. We cannot say, individuals should eat fish to reduce coronary heart disease Cross sectional studyexposure and outcome. Frequently surveys. 24 hr dietary recall Interview Not representative Expensive 72 hr food diary Person could lie Inaccurate Less prone to error than the FFQ Better to remember FFQ More prone to error Bias Interviewer bias-interviewee might not tell the truth because of the interviewer Selection bias- Information/misclassification: when someone is put in the wrong group Confounding Ecological Fallocy...
View Full Document
- Spring '10