Ch 4 & 5 Court Cases

Ch 4 & 5 Court Cases - Chapter 4 & 5 Relevant Court...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Chapter 4 & 5 Relevant Court Case Outcomes Chapter 4 • Beauharnais vs. Illinois- court upheld a statute that criminalized any publication that portrays depravity, criminality, unchastity, or lack of virtue in any class of citizens- the law was used to prosecute a hatemonger who distributed racist literature • Ashton vs. Kentucky- supreme court ruled unconstitutional a statute punishing speech that tends to breach the peace; court overturned conviction of Steve Ashton who was convicted under Kentucky criminal libel law for printing a pamphlet during bitter labor disputes that attacked chief of police, sheriff, and co-owner of Hazard Herald for their failure to support striking miners- law found too vague and imprecise, speakers did not know when their speech was “calculated to create disturbances of the peace” • New York Times vs. Sullivan- the law of ‘strict liability’ was declared unconstitutional when the media defame a public official--Court said 1 st amendment protects false and defamatory criticism of government officials; public officials cant sue for defamation without proving actual malice (NY Times actual malice)- ended the law of seditious libel-- Sullivan, a police official, sued NY Times for publishing a false and defamatory information, Heed Their Rising Voices; Sullivan won, but SC reversed it • Valentine vs. Chrestensen- court denied constitutional protection to a handbill it called purely commercial advertising—in Sullivan case, article was not purely advertising, so still protected • Rosenblatt vs. Baer- supervisor of a county-owned ski resort might be a public official if his position would invite public scrutiny and discussion of the person holding it • Garrison vs. Louisiana- comments that judges are lazy, vacation minded, and sympathetic to criminals were comments about their official conduct • Curtis Publishing Co vs. Butts- football coach and segregationist had to prove actual malice-reporters did not check the story of an unreliable source, did not interview witnesses, or view game films • Rosenbloom vs. Metromedia Inc.- private libel plaintiffs involved in issues of public importance have to prove actual malice—no longer the precedent, limited actual malice to public figures and officials •...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/30/2011 for the course JRLC 5040 taught by Professor Lee during the Spring '08 term at UGA.

Page1 / 5

Ch 4 & 5 Court Cases - Chapter 4 & 5 Relevant Court...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online