Ethnic Identity-Greek Antiquity_1

Ethnic Identity-Greek Antiquity_1 - E T H N I C I D E N T I...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: E T H N I C I D E N T I T Y I N G R E E K A N T I Q U I T Y A B r i e f S u m m a r y o f J . H a l l ’ s M a i n P o i n t s b y E . K o n d r a t i e f f 1 INTRODUCTION: HALL’s Thesis: • Ethnic Groups were NOT ultimately biological (racial), linguistic, religious, or cultural groups; these symbols of ethnicity only bolster an identity constructed in spoken or written discourse. • They were social groups whose origins in extraneous territories were just as often imagined as they were real. • H. adopts an anthropological point of view, examining evidence from: Literature, Archaeology, and Linguistics. • Emphasizes active, constructive and dynamic role of Ethnography, Genealogy, Material Culture and Language in shaping Ethnic Consciousness. HALL’s Goal: • To better define the role which Archaeology and Language play in the study of Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Quotes: On Archaeology : “While material symbols can certainly be selected as active emblems of a consciously proclaimed ethnic identity, it is a mistake to assume that material culture patterning can serve as an objec- tive or passive indication of ethnic groups.” (p.3) On Linguistics : “... a close analysis of dialect reveals that linguistic boundaries are NOT entirely coter- minous with ethnic boundaries, that the Greeks themselves could not have relied on linguistic clues only in assigning dialect-speakers to ethnic groups [as w/Lydian soldier speaking Boiotian in the Anabasis; or the return of Athenians from slavery speaking a “foreign tongue”], and that linguistic development in Greece may operate independently of ethnic factors. Again . . . linguistic symbols may be actively em- ployed at certain times as part of an ethnic strategy . . . some . . . ethnic groups consciously sought to bol- ster their distinctiveness through the medium of language.” (p.3) CHAPTER 1: History of the study of ethnicity – Discussion of Curtius, Mueller, Fustel de Coulanges, Edouard Will, etc. CHAPTER 2: The nature and expression of ethnicity: an anthropological view – Excerpts Primordialists: Ethnicity is an extension of kinship and the normal vehicle through which common goals might be pursued [i.e., Ethnicity has a determinist role; a role in forming/shaping/directing economic forces anciently] Instrumentalists: Ethnic Groups exploit symbol of shared, ancestral association to mask their real pur- pose: pursuit of political or economic interests (“Ethnicity serves purposes other than the cultural goals which its spokesmen proclaim to be its raison d’être.) They see ethnicity as a fairly recent phenomenon. Note: Threatened/oppressed “ethnic” groups are most likely to take a primordialist view (e.g., Hutu from Chad) while outside observers (e.g., anthropologists) or non-threatened/dominant groups (e.g., Tutsi) tend more to the instrumentalist viewpoint....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/31/2011 for the course GRC 0904 taught by Professor Kondratieff during the Spring '11 term at Temple.

Page1 / 6

Ethnic Identity-Greek Antiquity_1 - E T H N I C I D E N T I...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online