This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: provide an example of one or two of these changes. I interpreted Burnham to be referring to ethical issues, like gay marriage. But I think you are referring to more serious changes, such as Texas’s potential secession. This was the only spot where I felt that it needed more input and support. Aside from that, I found everything else to be outstanding. I like your last sentence so much, that I would suggest incorporating it into your thesis. Maybe changing your last sentence of your first paragraph to read “I will then proceed to evaluate his claim of how the paradox can be resolved, challenging his beliefs that following traditions is the closest America can come to obtaining the ideal government”. It just seems like this was a key point in your paper, but it was not included in your opening thesis. Otherwise, this was very good....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/04/2011 for the course PHILOSOPHY 0924 taught by Professor Taylor during the Fall '09 term at Temple.
- Fall '09