Team B - Week 4 - ICQ for Apollo Shoes Case

Team B - Week 4 - ICQ for Apollo Shoes Case - Team B Due...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Team B – Due for week 4 Date: Thu, 17 JAN 2008 7:42:53 +0000 From: "Darlene Wardlaw" <[email protected]> Subject: Understanding the Revenue Cycle Attachment: <<RevenueICQ.doc>> I’ve attached a Sales internal control questionnaire from another engagement that I think you can use for Apollo. You may want to talk to Karina Ramirez to get answers to the questions. 1. Complete the ICQ for Apollo. For “yes” answers, add a comment stating which department and clerk performs the function. For “no” answers, describe the possible “errors” or “frauds” that could occur because of the control weakness. 2. I’ve started a flowchart and listed some strengths and weaknesses, but had to leave before I could finish it. See if you need to add any more strengths and/or weaknesses that you find from the ICQ and narrative descriptions of the revenue cycle. DW Date: Sat, 19 JAN 2008 00:35:24 +0000 From: "Darlene Wardlaw" <[email protected]> Subject: Purchasing Cycle Bridge Working Paper I am glad that you don’t mind working on Saturdays. Welcome to “Busy Season!” Similar to what you did with the Revenue Cycle, I want you to prepare a bridge working paper for the audit of Apollo Shoes as of December 31, 2007, listing the major errors that could occur in the purchasing system and to describe the test of controls procedures for auditing related purchasing controls to determine whether reliable control exists. I don’t think that Apollo has enough purchase transactions that we need to rely on the controls (in other words, we’ll look at them all), but we need to document our finding for our 404 work: 1. In the first column, use an index number (S-# or W-#) to indicate potential strength or weakness. If you have time , you may want to prepare a purchasing cycle flowchart. Not required, but could be helpful. 2. In the second column, describe the control activity (or lack thereof) that may serve to prevent, detect, or correct errors or frauds. Understand that Apollo may or may not have the control activity in place. If they do, we may test the control if that is cost-effective. If they don’t, we can propose the control as a management letter comment. 3. In the third column, describe the audit implications of the strengths/ weaknesses related to the control activities with respect to transactions or accounts reported in the financial statements (e.g., the presence of a properly completed purchase order check ensures that purchases are authorized). 4. In the fourth column, describe how specifically how (recalculation, reperformance, inquiry and observation, etc.) you would test the control.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
5. Finally, add a fifth column for compensating audit procedures. If the control activity is not in place, or the control activity is in place but not effective, we need to determine what audit procedure (i.e., a compensating test) we could use to catch them. (For example, we can use customer confirmations to test the validity of the transactions if we can’t rely on the client’s controls.)
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/07/2011 for the course ACCT 490 taught by Professor Richard during the Spring '11 term at DeVry Long Beach.

Page1 / 11

Team B - Week 4 - ICQ for Apollo Shoes Case - Team B Due...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online