PROJ402 - I Introduction It is ironic the large emphasis...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
I. Introduction It is ironic the large emphasis that is placed on the “personal interview” when arriving at selection decisions within organizations, despite its low reliability and low accuracy in predicting future job performance. These interviews are usually relatively unstructured, and many recent literature reviews suggest that its low validity is often due to judgmental errors made by the interviewer and also the numerous errors and biases associated with the processing of the applicant information. Since the workforce is the primary asset in most organizations, one might assume that the most effective selection strategy would be chosen to maximize productivity. Personal interviewing continues to be the most widely used method for selecting employees and is often used in conjunction with other techniques such as reference checking, weighted application blanks, skill tests, and psychological testing. There are obviously good reasons for the popularity of the employment interview despite the controversy regarding its validity. This paper analyzes the validity of the interview - the measure of the degree to which the test predicts job success. Good selection doesn’t depend only on quality information, but on the quality of the interpretation. In the interview, the interviewer looks at the background of the applicant, analyzes the applicant’s responses during the interview and makes judgments about the behavior of the applicant. There are many factors affecting the validity: pre-interview impressions, psychological selective perceptions, stereotypes, halo-effect, trait configurations, etc. Thus, often the validity of the interview rests on the interviewer. The interviewer needs to recognize that everyone perceives things in different ways. Furthermore, interview perceptions are based on the interviewer’s life experiences, goals, needs and values, and thus can affect the judgment of the applicant. First of all, we will discuss some of the psychological pitfalls of personal interviewing. Second, we will look at a company which is experiencing personnel problems, and third, we will look at how the problems can be resolved. II. Pre-interview Impression Effects A. Pre-interview Impressions: Before the interviewer greets the applicant and begins the discussion, judgments are likely to have already been formed. Impressions of the applicant’s qualifications and characteristics by looking solely at the application and resume could bias the conduct of the interviewer and the eventual results. First impressions of a person from just paper credentials can exert a disproportionate influence on our continued perception of them. A process model by Dipboye, 1982, proposes three interview phases: 1. The Pre-interview Phase; 2. The Interview Phase - the face-to-face interview with the applicant; 3. The Post-Interview Phase - where impressions are formed of the applicant’s qualifications and the decision is made to hire or not to hire. A study at the University Placement Center of 120 interviews by Macan and Dipboye in
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

PROJ402 - I Introduction It is ironic the large emphasis...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online