Chapter 16 Public Choice

Chapter 16 Public Choice - CHAPTER 16 Public Choice:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHAPTER 16 Public Choice: Politics in Government And the Workplace I have no fear, but that the result of our experiment will be, that men may be trusted to govern themselves without a master. Could the contrary be proved, I should conclude, either that there is no God, or that he is a malevolent being. Thomas Jefferson revious chapters have discussed the effects of various government policies on the market system in general and the firm in particular. We looked at government efforts to control the external costs of pollution. We considered the economic impact of price controls and consumer protection laws, for example, on the market for final goods and services. Throughout the analysis we have focused on assessing the economic efficiency of government policy. We said little about how government policy is determined or why government prefers one policy to another. In this chapter, we will shift our focus to the functioning of government itself. Using economic principles, we will examine the process through which government decisions are made and carried out in a two-party democratic system, and consider its consequences. Today, when government production accounts for a substantial portion of the nation’s goods and services, no student of economics can afford to ignore these issues. A study of the political process is especially important for many MBA students, mainly because a non-trivial amount of your time will be involved with seeking to change one governmental policy or another. Moreover, politics is also endemic to many businesses. Our discussion of the “economics of politics” has various implications for how businesses can be expected to operate, especially those that rely on “participatory management” processes (which are necessarily democratic to one extent or another). The Central Tendency of a Two-Party System In a two-party democratic system, elected officials typically take middle-of-the road positions. Winning candidates tend to represent the moderate views of many voters who are neither liberals nor conservatives. For this reason there is generally little difference between Republican and Democratic candidates. Even when the major parties’ candidates differ strongly, as Ronald Reagan and Walter Mondale did at the start of their 1984 presidential campaign, they tend to move closer together as the campaign progresses. P
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Chapter 16 Public Choice: Politics in Government and the Workplace 2 Figure 16.1 illustrates politicians’ incentives to move toward the center. The bell- shaped curve shows the approximate distribution of voters along the political spectrum. A few voters have views that place them in the wings of the distribution, but most cluster near the center. Assuming that citizens will vote for the candidate who most closely approximates their own political position, a politician who wants to win the election will not choose a position in the wings of the distribution. Suppose, for instance, that the Republican candidate chooses a position at
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/10/2011 for the course BUSI 1100 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '11 term at North Texas.

Page1 / 24

Chapter 16 Public Choice - CHAPTER 16 Public Choice:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online