{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Jeanette Winterson article 5

Jeanette Winterson article 5 - Powerful Differences...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Powerful Differences: Critique and Eros in Jeanette Winterson and Virginia Woolf Christy L. Burns It is obvious that the values of women differ very often from the values which have been made by the other sex; naturally, this is so. Yet it is the masculine values that prevail. Speaking crudely, football and sport are "important"; the worship of fashion, the buying of clothes "trivial." And these values are inevitably transferred from life to fiction. This is an important book, the critic assumes, because it deals with war. This is an insignificant book because it deals with the feelings of women in a drawing room. A scene from a battlefield is more important than a scene in a shop--everywhere and much more subtly the difference of value persists. --Virginia Woolf, A Room of One's Own Taste is the faculty of estimating an object or a mode of representation by means of a delight or aversion apart from any interest . . . the judgement of taste, with its attendant consciousness of detachment from all interest, must involve a claim to validity for all men, and must do so apart from universality attached to Objects, i.e. there must be coupled with it a claim to subjective universality. --Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Judgement [End Page 364] Virginia Woolf was never ambivalent about taste; it was defined in part by sex and rifled with subjective prejudices. The very shape of the novel is for her constituted by emotions in conflict, and its evaluation tempered by subjective response. 1 While she shares with Kant and other philosophers of aesthetics a general awareness of the role of subjective interest and even calls on women writers to press toward a place of disinterestedness, she repeatedly resists the notion of universal value. For her, value could never be purely divorced from gender. As Christopher Reed points out, however, in the 1920s Woolf favored the abstracted version of phenomenology promoted in the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
aesthetic theories of Clive Bell and Roger Fry, a position that has sometimes confused issues and lead to arguments that her art was apolitical. 2 Influenced by phenomenology and Post-Impressionism, Bloomsbury formalism emphasized a rejection of strict realism in favor of a more transcendent abstraction of forms, which often left behind subjective definitions of experience. Woolf's appropriation of this aesthetic, however, was marked by a strategy of balance and reversal, which she developed in her use of a feminine formalism to challenge "Mr. Wells, Mr. Bennet, and Mr. Galsworthy" in her essay "Modern Novels." 3 More importantly, she invoked as feminine the phenomenologically sensate effects of the real, in the realm of the everyday, which extend beyond the reach of the rational and classical definitions imposed by Oxbridge. 4 Woolf's early aesthetics is thus neither universal nor explicitly "value-laden," in the sense of propounding a certain ethics; rather, it takes up the trace of evocative effects brought on by color, rhythm, or "the way people look and laugh, and run up the steps of omnibuses" (Woolf, Jacob's 82). In her pursuit of this effect, Woolf was simultaneously acting on her
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 25

Jeanette Winterson article 5 - Powerful Differences...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online