This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: CS237. Problem Set 8: Variance, Geometric Distribution and Coupon Collector Problem Graded Problems due Thurs March 31 11:59PM. April 9, 2011 Reading. Schaums Chapter 5.4, 5.5. M&U 2.4 and 3.2 and Lemma 3.8 on page 51. 1 Practice Problems. Exercise 1. In class we proved that if X 1 ,X 2 are independent random variables, then VAR[ X 1 + X 2 ] = VAR[ X 1 ] + VAR[ X 2 ] (1) 1. Show that equation (1) does not hold if X 1 and X 2 are not independent. (To do this, give a specific counterexample, i.e., give example dependent RVs X 1 and X 2 that show that (1) does not hold.) Ilir notes: Consider the following example. Roll a die n times. Let X be the number of 6 and Y be the number of 1 . X i is indicator if on the i th run 6 appeared, and Y i is the indicator if on the i th trial 1 appeared. We have X = X 1 + + X n and Y = Y 1 + + Y n . Now, EX = EY = n/ 6 and VAR X = VAR Y = 5 / 36 n . However, VAR( X + Y ) VAR X VAR Y 6 = 0 . 2. Prove the general version of this theorem. This is, for independent random variables X 1 ,X 2 ,...,X n , prove that VAR[ n X i =1 X i ] = n X i =1 VAR[ X i ] (2) Ilir notes: Lets let i = E [ X i ] . We have VAR( n X i =1 X i ) = E " n X i =1 ( X i i ) ! 2 # = n X i =1 E ( X i i )2 + X i 6 = j E (( X i i )( X j j )) = n X i =1 VAR[ X i ] + X i 6 = j E [( X i i )( X j j )] To complete the proof we need only show that for any independent pair X j ,X i where i 6 = j we have E [( X i i )( X j j )] = 0 We do this as follows: E [( X i i )( X j j )] = E [ X i X j i X j j X i + i j ] = E [ X i X j ] i E [ X j ] j [ X i ] + i j ] = E [ X i X j ] i j = E [ X i ] E [ X j ] i j = i j i j = 0 1 were we used linearity of expectation to go from the first line to the second line, the definition of i , j to go from the second to the third line, and the independence of X i ,X j to go from the third line to the fourth. This completes our proof....
View Full
Document
 Spring '11
 Goldberg

Click to edit the document details