Federico Echenique A short and constructive proof of Tarski's fixed-point theorem

Federico Echenique A short and constructive proof of Tarski's fixed-point theorem

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: A SHORT AND CONSTRUCTIVE PROOF OF TARSKI’S FIXED-POINT THEOREM FEDERICO ECHENIQUE Abstract. I give short and constructive proofs of Tarski’s fixed- point theorem, and of a much-used extension of Tarski’s fixed-point theorem to set-valued maps. 1. Introduction I give short and constructive proofs of two related fixed-point the- orems. The first is Tarski’s fixed-point theorem: If F is a monotone function on a non-empty complete lattice, the set of fixed points of F form a non-empty complete lattice. The second is a much-used extension of Tarski’s fixed-point theorem to set-valued functions: If ϕ : X → 2 X is monotone—when 2 X is endowed with the induced set order—the set of fixed-points of ϕ form a non-empty complete lattice. Tarski’s [4] original proof is beautiful and elegant, but non-constructive and somewhat uninformative. Cousot and Cousot [1] give a construc- tive proof of Tarski’s fixed-point theorem. Their proof is long and quite involved, though. The proof I present is much simpler, and fits in a napkin. On the other hand, [1] obtain certain sub-products from their approach that I do not obtain; I shall only be concerned with Tarski’s fixed-point theorem, and its extension to set-valued functions. The extension to set-valued functions was developed by Smith [3] and Zhou [7]. I give a constructive proof of Zhou’s version of the result. Zhou’s version of the result is important in game theory ([5],[6]). Smith has a weaker monotonicity requirement than Zhou, but Smith does not obtain a lattice structure on the set of fixed-points. In addition, Smith needs a continuity assumption. 2. Definitions A set X endowed with a partial order ≤ is denoted h X, ≤i . h X, ≤i is a complete lattice if, for all nonempty B ⊆ X , V B and W B exist in Date : May 5, 2003....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/18/2011 for the course COMPUTER S 1111 taught by Professor Name during the Spring '05 term at MIT.

Page1 / 4

Federico Echenique A short and constructive proof of Tarski's fixed-point theorem

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online