hw_8_soln - CS 473: Algorithms, Fall 2008 HW 8 (Solution)...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: CS 473: Algorithms, Fall 2008 HW 8 (Solution) This homework contains four problems. Read the instructions for submitting homework on the course webpage . In particular, make sure that you write the solutions for the problems on separate sheets of paper; the sheets for each problem should be stapled together. Write your name and netid on each sheet. Collaboration Policy: For this home work, Problems 1-3 can be worked in groups of up to 3 students each. Problem 0 should be answered in Compass as part of the assessment HW7-Online and should be done individually. 1. (35 pts) Suppose we want to write an efficient function Shuffle ( n ) that returns a permutation of the set { 1,2,..., n } chosen uniformly at random. (a) Prove that the following algorithm is not correct. [ Hint: Consider n = 3. ] Solution: Heres the one-line proof: 3 3 / 3! = 27 / 6 = 9 / 2 is not an integer. Here are the output probabilities for each permutation when n = 3: Pr [ 1 2 3 ] = 4 / 27 Pr [ 1 3 2 ] = 5 / 27 Pr [ 2 1 3 ] = 5 / 27 Pr [ 2 3 1 ] = 5 / 27 Pr [ 3 1 2 ] = 4 / 27 Pr [ 3 2 1 ] = 4 / 27 More generally, there are exactly n n possible outcomes for this algorithm, because there are n possible return values for each of the n calls to R ANDOM. Each of these outcomes occurs with probability 1 / n n . If each permutation is equally likely, then exactly n n / n ! different outcomes lead to each permutation. But for any n 3, the number n n / n ! is not an integer n ! is divisible by n- 1, but n n is notso we have a contradiction. Thus, for any n 3, some permutations must be more likely than others. Rubric: 7 points for a correct proof. Considering the case n = 3 is enough. (b) Prove that the following implementation of Shuffle ( n ) is correct. What is its expected running time? Solution: The algorithm is vacuously correct when n = 0, so assume n 1. The algorithm places the integer 1 uniformly at random into the array , say into slot [ j ] . By the induction hypothesis, the remainder of the algorithm fills the other n- 1 slots of with a permutation of the set { 2,3,..., n } chosen uniformly at random. Thus, the output array is equally likely to be any permutation of the set { 1,2,..., n } . Let X i denote the number of calls to R ANDOM during the i th iteration of the outer loop; the running time of the algorithm is clearly ( i X i ) . During the i th iteration of the outer loop, exactly i- 1 of the slots in the output array are already occupied. Thus, with probability ( i- 1 ) / n , the while loop iterates more than once. Since the random numbers produced by R ANDOM are identically distributed, we have a recurrence E [ X i ] = 1 + i- 1 n E [ X i ] , 1 whose solution is E [ X i ] = n / ( n- i + 1 ) . Thus, the total expected number of calls to R ANDOM is exactly n X i = 1 n n- i + 1 = n n X j = 1 1 j = n H n , which implies that the algorithms expected running time is...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/18/2011 for the course CS 473 taught by Professor Chekuri,c during the Spring '08 term at University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.

Page1 / 6

hw_8_soln - CS 473: Algorithms, Fall 2008 HW 8 (Solution)...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online