This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: reparation from an unofficial act that happened before becoming president? No. Reasoning: No, it does not give him immunity so yes he can still be prosecuted. The Separation Doctrine does not bar every exercise of jurisdiction over the President of the United States. The Federal District Court has jurisdiction to decide this case. Respondents have a right to an orderly disposition of her claims. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Holdings: The Courts ruling was unanimous. The Court held that separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of important information can give good reason for an Courtney Smith Professor King Con Law 4200 9/20/10 incompetent Presidential protection from the United States judicial process....
View Full Document
- Fall '10
- Supreme Court of the United States, President of the United States, President Clinton, Courtney Smith Professor, Smith Professor King