Dames & Moore v. Regan - Reasoning Yes because its his job to do so by what the IEEPA states Its stated saying that by the strongest of

Courtney Smith Professor King Con Law 4200 9/14/10 Dames & Moore v. Regan brief Facts: Dames & Moore v. Regan (June 24, 1981) is the case where President Jimmy Carter aroused the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and halted Iranian possessions in the United States. When the hostages were released the Carter administration destroyed all preceding against the Iranian government. This case showed us that the President may also suspend claims chasing to the Executive Order. Issues: Were the presidents procedures of nullifying the attachments and arranging the turn over of all frozen assets specifically authorized by Congress and fair? Yes

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Reasoning: Yes, because its his job to do so by what the IEEPA states. Its stated saying that by the strongest of presumptions and widest latitude of judicial interpretation and the burden of persuasion rests heavily on any who might attack it. President Jimmy Carter was only following the rules. However, after the case was settled the President was allowed to hang up the awaiting claims against Iran because Congress consented. Holdings: Regan won the case 8 to 1. This case won based on the facts it provided while in court. The court showed us that the President has the power to end claims....
View Full Document