Unformatted text preview: potential gun owners result in a federal confiscation of state bureaucrats? Reasoning: Yes. This is unmatched as to state officers, but lacking States' consent, this is in effect a act which gives the public no alternative through its discontentment. Holding: The courts ruling was 5 votes for Printz, 4 against. Interim provisions were unconstitutional. These provisions violated dual sovereignty because they compelled states to administer a federal regulatory scheme. Congress has no authority to require state and local officials to carry out federal laws....
View Full Document
- Fall '10
- Supreme Court of the United States, United States Congress, Printz, state officers