PHL 344 Moral Theories

PHL 344 Moral Theories - utilitarianism,(...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
utilitarianism,( consequentialism): Always act so as to bring about the greatest amount of good overall: All consequences are morally relevant, Nothing else is morally relevant, So: not a matter of following absolute rules; what’s right depends on the circumstances, maximize good outcomes. Problems: What counts as the good ? Happiness (“Classical Utilitarianism”) Preference satisfaction List of specific objective goods (friendship, knowledge, beauty, liberty…….) UNWORKABILITY/CONCEPTUAL PROBLEMS (a) we can’t know the consequences (especially long-term ones) (b) concept of happiness (or good) too unclear (c) incomparability of different goods (and the goods of different people) UNINTUITIVE (SEEMINGLY IMMORAL) IMPLICATIONS (i) Rights (ii) Backward-looking considerations (e.g., promises) (iii) Distributive justice Benefits: sensitive to particular circumstances, impartial, allows for measurements, relates to both individual and policy decisions. Egalitarianism: Everything should be equal. Libertarianism: freedom/ autonomy from the government is the most important. As long as you don’t break certain laws you should be exempt from certain government policies. Kantianism
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/20/2011 for the course PHL 344 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at Michigan State University.

Page1 / 3

PHL 344 Moral Theories - utilitarianism,(...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online